6 military academies.They also noted that the State has not specified if the stages of the courses are annual or biannual, or if they form part of the permanent training curricula of the armed forces. They also indicated that the "Master Program of Education in Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law" was approved in 2002, prior to the Judgment of the Court, and that the reports "refer to the class per[i]ods from 2008, and the information was not up-to-date." They expressed their concern regarding the "apparent exclusion of military commanders from [such courses]." 20. The Commission valued the information provided, however, it noted that the number, or rank, of Armed Forces members trained has not been mentioned, and the State "refers to information from 2008, without any documentation on training programs and courses from 2009 and 2010." 21. The President considers it necessary for the Court to receive up-to-date and specific information on the matter, particularly regarding whether the programs are ongoing, the universe of recipients of these programs and how they were being executed. * * * 22. Regarding the obligation to publish in a nationally circulated newspaper, on just one occasion, the chapter on the proven facts of the Judgment, without corresponding footnotes, and the operative paragraphs of the Judgment(operative paragraph thirteen of the Judgment), the State reported that the publication was made in the La Nation newspaper on October 18, 2007, and it attached a copy. 23. The representatives did not address this point, and the Commission "too[k] note of the information provided by the State [and awaited] the comments of the representatives." 24. The President believes it is essential that the Court have the observations of the representatives regarding compliance with this reparation measure so that the Court can determine its compliance. * * * 25. Regarding the obligation to adapt domestic legislation on recruitment of children under 18 years in the armed forces of Paraguay, in accordance with the relevant international standards (operative paragraph fourteen of the Judgment), the State indicated that it has fully complied with this point. In this regard, in addition to measures already reported 6the State said that on May 20, 2008, Law 3485, which amends Law No. 123/52 of CIMEFOR, states in article 10 that "the special courses of Military Instruction and Officer and Reserve Officer Training is aimed at students who are over eighteen years of age." 26 Representatives noted that, "the information provided by the State [...] accounts for the full compliance with [this] obligation." The Commission, meanwhile, valued the report from the State, however, they stressed the need to verify "the 6 Cf. Case of Vargas Areco, supra note 5, Considering Clause 33 and 36.