108. As it has in other cases, 96 the Court orders the State to publish the following, within six months of notification of this judgment and in a font that is legible and appropriate: (a) the official summary of this judgment prepared by the Court, to run once only in the official gazette La Gaceta and in two newspapers with nationwide circulation, and (b) this judgment in its entirety, available for one year, on the official websites of the judiciary, the Secretariat of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation, the Office of the Public Prosecutor, the Secretariat of National Defense, the Secretariat of Security, the Office of the Solicitor General and the Secretariat of Human Rights. The State must report to this Court as soon as it has proceeded with each of the publications ordered, without awaiting the one-year term to submit its first report as stipulated in operative paragraph nine of the instant judgment. E.2. Public act of recognition of international responsibility 109. The Court also orders the State to hold a public act of recognition of international responsibility for the incidents in the instant case, within one year of the date of notification of this judgment. The human rights violations declared in this judgment should be named in the ceremony, as well as the context involving enforcement of the national security doctrine. The act should take the form of a public ceremony in the presence of the victims declared herein and their representatives, if they so desire. The State must cover any expenditures they may incur for this purpose. It will also guarantee the participation of high-level officials of at least: the Supreme Court, the Executive Branch, the Office of the Public Prosecutor, the Secretariat of National Defense, the Office of the Solicitor General, and the Secretariat of Human Rights. The date of the act, place where it will be held, what it will include, and the content of the spoken message that will be given in the ceremony should be determined by advance agreement with the victims and/or their representatives. The State must broadcast the ceremony over the state television station, Televisión Nacional de Honduras, and a radio station that has nationwide coverage. 97 E.3. Construction of a mausoleum 110. The Court orders the State to proceed, within two years of the date of notification of the judgment, to build a mausoleum on Herminio Deras García’s grave site as a means of keeping his memory alive. Herminio Deras Garcia’s family members must be in agreement with the design of the mausoleum. The mausoleum should be unveiled in a ceremony broadcast over the state television channel, Televisión Nacional de Honduras, and a radio station with nationwide coverage, and it should be attended by governmental authorities. The State must also provide for attendance by those family members of Deras García who have also been declared victims by this Court, if they so wish. F. Guarantees of non-recurrence 111. In response to the measures of reparation requested by the Commission and the representatives, the State, in its brief of acquiescence, pledged as follows: to implement the guarantees of non-recurrence outlined by the applicants in their brief with pleadings, motions and evidence in the Case of Deras García et al. v. Honduras, consisting of recommendations for public policies of memory in at least three subject areas: 96 Cf. Case of Cantoral Benavides v. Peru. Reparations and Costs. Judgment of December 3, 2001. Series C No. 88, para. 79, and Case of Guevara Díaz v. Costa Rica, supra, para. 92. 97 See, for example, Case of the Miguel Castro Castro Prison v. Peru. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 25, 2006. Series C No. 160, para. 445, Case of Pavez Pavez v. Chile. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of February 4, 2022. Series C No. 449, para. 173, and Case of Movilla Galarcio et al. v. Colombia, supra, para. 225.