99. Additionally, in the framework of freedom of information, the Court considers that there is a duty for journalists to verify in a reasonable manner, although not necessarily exhaustively, the facts on which they base their information. 154 In other words, it is valid to demand fairness and diligence in the verification of sources and the search for information. This implies the right not to receive a manipulated version of events. Therefore, journalists have a duty to keep a critical distance from their sources and check them against other relevant data. 155 A.2.3. Permissible restrictions on freedom of expression and the application of subsequent liabilities 100. The Court has reiterated that freedom of expression is not an absolute right. Article 13(2) of the Convention, which prohibits prior censorship, also provides for the possibility of demanding subsequent liability for the abusive exercise of this right, including to ensure "respect for the rights or reputation of others" (paragraph (a) of Article 13(2)). These restrictions are of an exceptional nature and must not limit, beyond what is strictly necessary, the full exercise of freedom of expression and become a direct or indirect mechanism of prior censorship. 156 In this sense, the Court has established that such subsequent liabilities can be imposed, insofar as the right to honor and reputation could have been affected. 157 101. Article 11 of the Convention establishes, in effect, that every person has the right to the protection of their honor and recognition of their dignity. The Court has indicated that the right to honor “recognizes that every person has the right to respect, prohibits any illegal attack against honor or reputation and imposes on the States the duty to provide the protection of the law against such attacks. In general terms, this Court has indicated that the right to honor is related to self-esteem and worth, while reputation refers to the opinion that others have of a person.” 158 102. In this sense, this Court has held that “both freedom of expression and the right to honor, both rights protected by the Convention, are extremely important, hence both rights must be guaranteed in a way that ensures they coexist harmoniously." 159 Every fundamental right must be exercised with respect and safeguarding of other fundamental rights. 160. Therefore, the Court has indicated that “the solution to the conflict arising between some rights requires examining each case in accordance with its specific 154 Cf. Case of Kimel v. Argentina, supra, par. 79, and Case of Mémoli v. Argentina. Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of August 22, 2013, Series C, No. 265, par. 122. Cf. Case of Kimel v. Argentina, supra, par. 79, and Case of Granier et al. (Radio Caracas Televisión) v. Venezuela, supra, par. 139. 155 Cf. Case of Herrera Ulloa v. Costa Rica, supra, par. 120. Case of Álvarez Ramos v. Venezuela. Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of August 30, 2019. Series C No. 380, par. 101. 156 157 Case of Mémoli v. Argentina, supra, par. 123, and Case of Álvarez Ramos v. Venezuela, supra, par. 101. Cf. Case of Tristán Donoso v. Panama. Preliminary Exceptions, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of January 27, 2009. Series C No. 193, par. 57, and Case of Álvarez Ramos v. Venezuela, supra, par. 102. 158 159 Cf. Case of Kimel v. Argentina, supra, par. 51, and Case of Álvarez Ramos v. Venezuela, supra, par. 103. 160 Cf. Case of Kimel v. Argentina, supra, par. 75, and Case of Álvarez Ramos v. Venezuela, supra, par. 103. 36