CEJIL

- Library
- Sign in

Previous 83 / 110 Next

Normal view

Ricardo C. Pérez Manrique Judge Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary 11

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Uwazi is developed by
CEJIL
Library
Login

Info
18Relationships

Search Tips

Search text

Type something in the search box to get some results.

I INTRODUCTION TO THE CASE AND PURPOSE OF THE DISPUTE4
II PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT5
III JURISDICTION8
IV ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY 8
A. The State’s partial acknowledgment of responsibility and observations of the representatives and the Commission8
B. Considerations of the Court11
B.1 Regarding the facts11
B.2 Regarding the legal claims11
B.3 Regarding reparations12
B.4 Assessment of acknowledgement12
V EVIDENCE 13
A. Admission of documentary evidence13
B. Admission of expert statements and evidence16
VI FACTS16
A. Context16
B. On Emilio Palacio Urrutia, Nicolás Pérez Lapentti, César Enrique Pérez Barriga, and Carlos Eduardo Pérez Barriga19
C. The article “NO to lies”20
D. The legal proceedings for “serious slanderous insult against authority”22
D.1. The judgment of first instance24
D.2. Remedy for annulment and appeal25
D.3. Cassation appeal27
D.4. Factual Remedy filed by Emilio Palacio Urrutia28
D.5. Correa’s pardon28
E. Additional facts related to the case28
VII MERITS30
VII-I RIGHTS TO FREEDOM OF THOUGHT AND EXPRESSION, TO THE PRINCIPLE OF LEGALITY AND NON-RETROACTIVITY, TO PERSONAL FREEDOM, TO PROPERTY, TO WORK, AND OF MOVEMENT AND RESIDENCE, IN RELATION TO THE DUTY30
A. Right to freedom of thought and expression and the principle of legality31
A.1. Arguments of the Commission and the parties31
A.2. Considerations of the Court31
B. Right to personal freedom43
B.1. Arguments of the Commission and the parties43
B.2. Considerations of the Court43
C. Right to property45
C.1. Arguments of the Commission and of the parties45
C.2. Considerations of the Court45
D. Right of movement and residence47
D.1. Arguments of the Commission and the parties47
D.2. Considerations of the Court48
E. Right to work49
E.1. Arguments of the Commission and the parties50
E.2. Considerations of the Court50
F. Conclusion53
VIII REPARATIONS54
A. Injured Party54
B. Measures of Restitution55
B.1. Requests of the Commission and the parties55
B.2. Considerations of the Court55
C. Measures of satisfaction55
C.1. Requests of the Commission and the parties55
C.2. Considerations of the Court56
D. Guarantees of non-repetition56
D.1. Requests of the Commission and the parties56
D.2. Considerations of the Court57
E. Additional measures requested59
E.1. Requests of the Commission and the parties59
E.2. Considerations of the Court59
F. Compensation59
G. Costs and expenses61
H. Method of compliance with payments ordered62
IX OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS63
THE COURT DECIDES,63
DECLARES,63
AND ESTABLISHES64
CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE SIERRA PORTO67
CONCURRING OPINION OF THE JUDGES FERRER MAC-GREGOR AND PEREZ MANRIQUE73
PARTIALLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE VIO GROSSI84

Palacio Urrutia y otros. Judgment. November 24, 2021

IACourt judgment

Preview

Type

Costs
Merits
Reparations

Date: Nov 24, 2021

Mechanism

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

Country

Ecuador

Signatories

Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot
Eduardo Vio Grossi
Elizabeth Odio Benito
Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni
Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
Ricardo C. Pérez Manrique

Separate vote

Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot
Eduardo Vio Grossi
Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni
Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
Ricardo C. Pérez Manrique

Primary Documents

Palacio Urrutia y otros. Judgment. November 24, 2021.pdf
English
Download View
Palacio Urrutia y otros. Sentencia de 24 de noviembre de 2021.pdf
Spanish
Download View

Supporting files

Palacio Urrutia y otros. Sentencia de 24 de noviembre de 2021.docx752.68 kB

No References

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

No Label1
- Case1
IACourt Documents5
- Order of the President IACHR1
- Hearing2
- Order of the IACourt2
País1
- Country1
Signatory Separate Vote3
- Judge and/or Commissioners3
Mecanismo1
- Mechanism1
Signatories3
- Judge and/or Commissioners3
Separate Votes4
- Separate vote4

Create Reference

Select relationship type

Relacionado a
CorteIDH
CIDH
Votos separados
Paises
Jueces intervinientes
País
Multi Select
Mecanismo
Firmantes
Sexo
Tipo
Firmante Voto separado
Estado
Descriptores
Geolocalización de los hechos del caso
Medidas de Protección

Search Tips

Connect to a paragraph

Connect to an entity

Disable highlights

Add to table of contents

Notifications

You're all caught up

New activity will show up here.