17 the next of kin and the other former habitants of that location, the State shall inform of the measures adopted or to be implemented in seeking to guarantee adequate security conditions in order to make the return of the beneficiaries that so wish to do so possible. 37. That there are, in fact, several ways to comply with this stipulation, in consideration of possible risks verified for those people. However, the Court considers it necessary to recall that one of the suitable measures for the generation of security measures and guaranteeing the return of the next of kin of the victims to Pueblo Bello is, as pointed out by this Tribunal in paragraph 275 of the Judgment, avoiding impunity through the realization of a complete investigation and an effective judicial process, which would result in the elucidation of the facts and the punishment of the responsible parties. 38. That even though the State and the representatives expressed different opinions regarding the current security situation in the municipality of Pueblo Bello, it has been stated that the victims of forced displacement do not wish to return. Therefore, the State proposes that, in compliance with that ordered in the Judgment, it grant those victims socioeconomic aid. The representatives stated their agreement with this form of compliance, under certain conditions. Taking into account that the State has requested that the Tribunal allow the satisfaction of this measure of reparation through the mentioned granting of socioeconomic aid, the Court considers that, in attention to that stated in the Judgment and in considering clauses 42 through 49 of the Judgment of Interpretation (supra Having Seen paragraph 2), the proposal may be an adequate form of compliance, as long as it has the express support of the beneficiaries of the reparation ordered. Given the time that has gone by since the massacre, and taking into account the effects the forced displacement has on the victims and the situation of risk and vulnerability to which they are exposed, this reparation measure shall be complied with as soon as possible. Therefore, the Court urges the State to coordinate with the victims and their representatives the meetings and measures necessary to guarantee the safety of those victims that decide to return to Pueblo Bello and, while those security conditions are not in place, dispose of those resources necessary and sufficient to secure that the next of kin that have suffered the forced displacement may resettle wherever they freely and voluntarily state, in conditions similar to those they had prior to the facts. Alternatively, the State may provide socioeconomic aid to those victims if that is their will and with their express consent, and requests that the parties present complete and updated information in this regard. * * * Public act of apology and acknowledgment of international responsibility (thirteenth operative paragraph of the Judgment) 39. That with regard to the obligation to hold, within a one-year term, a public act of apology and acknowledgment of international responsibility, the Stated informed that in April 2007 it held a meeting with the representatives in which it stated that the public act of apology would be coordinated along with the next of kin of the victims. The State later mentioned that there different opinions arose with the representatives in what referred to the appointment of the State official in charge of presiding the act of acknowledgment of responsibility, and with regard to the geographical location where it should be held. The State had appointed the Minister of Internal Affairs and