4 others as alleged intermediate authors on the charge of forced disappearance against Fortunato Santiago Gómez Palomino and society, and others as alleged coperpetrators, and another person, as an alleged accomplice in the crime against the life, body and health -Aggravated Murder (with malice aforethought)- also against Fortunato Santiago Gómez Palomino, finally, ordered to maintain the "Detention orders pronounced against the accused" and the "Limited Attendance ordered against the defendants." Furthermore, by virtue of that extension, the Court decided to extend the investigation term. Therefore, the representatives asked to continue monitoring this point. 8. The Commission awaits the State's next report containing detailed information on compliance with this obligation, which must be achieved within a reasonable term. 9. The President-in-Office for this case deemed it necessary that the Court receives updated and detailed information from the State and copies of relevant documentation on the progress of criminal proceedings for the forced disappearance of Santiago Gómez Palomino before the Fourth Special Criminal Court, under file No. 62-2007. In particular, it is imperative that the State provide detailed information on the new steps taken to comply with this point. b) Regarding paragraph eight of the Judgment 10. As for the obligation to conduct, with due diligence, the necessary actions to locate and deliver the mortal remains of Mr. Santiago Gómez Palomino to his nextof-kin, and provide the conditions necessary to transfer and bury these remains in place of their choice (operative paragraph eight of the Judgment), the State did not present the relevant information. 11. The representatives reported that in criminal proceedings before the Fourth Special Criminal Court, under file No. 62-2007, through the brief of December 1, 2008 they requested a copy of an investigation followed to locate human remains in the "La Chira" beach in 1993. Also, they warned that "during the trial proceedings steps were not taken to search for the remains of Santiago Gómez Palomino." Therefore, that considered it important that "the State provide information on State officials who received benefits for effective collaboration and regarding whether they have contributed to locating the remains of Santiago Gómez Palomino." 12. The Commission noted, with concern, that the State had not provided information regarding compliance with this point and reiterated the importance of this reparation measure; thus, all necessary actions should be taken, as soon as possible, to locate the remains of Mr. Gómez Palomino. 13. The President-in-Office noted that the Court has no information or documentation relating to the measures taken or performed to locate and deliver the mortal remains of Mr. Santiago Gómez Palomino their families. Therefore, it considers it necessary that the Tribunal receives updated and detailed information regarding compliance with this point and, in particular on the measures taken by the State in this regard. a) Regarding operative paragraph nine of the Judgment 14. Regarding the obligation to publish at least once, in a nationally circulated