3. Violation of the judicial guarantees and the right to judicial protection recognized in articles 8(1) and 25 of the American Convention, in conjunction with articles 1(1) and 2 thereof, to the detriment of Mrs. María Inés Chinchilla Sandoval and her next of kin. The Commission is also asking the Court to order the following reparations: 1. Provide full redress for the human rights violations declared in the report, to include both the material and moral aspects. 2. Conduct and complete a thorough, impartial, effective and swift investigation to establish the blame –criminal and otherwise- for the violations established in the report. 3. Adopt measures of non-repetition, to include the following: i) the guarantee of adequate and prompt access to medical care in the Centro de Orientación Femenino; ii) the guarantee of adequate prison conditions for disabled persons incarcerated in the Centro de Orientación Femenino, consistent with the standards described in the present report; iii) institutional strengthening and training of judicial authorities charged with enforcement of sentences, to ensure that they effectively perform their role as guarantors of the rights of persons deprived of liberty; and iv) regulation of a rapid and effective judicial remedy that can be used to secure protection of the rights to life and to humane treatment when the health needs of inmates so require. Apart from the need to obtain justice owing to the failure to comply with the recommendations made in the merits report, the Commission believes that the case raises questions of inter-America ordre public. Specifically, the case will give the Court an opportunity to develop and elaborate upon its case law on the subject of the rights to life, to personal integrity and to judicial protection enjoyed by persons deprived of their liberty who require specific medical treatment because of the particular nature of their illness and/or who have a disability. This case will also give the Court an opportunity to build upon its case law on the subject of the standards of due diligence required when investigating cases in which a person died while in the custody of the State because of a lack of proper medical attention, and regarding the extent of the duty to punish health professionals, court authorities and prison officials for failure to provide proper medical care and to ensure adequate detention conditions. Because the issues that this case raises have a significant impact on inter-American ordre public, in keeping with Article 35(1)(f) of the Rules of Procedure of the Inter-American Court, the Inter-American Commission will offer the following statements by the following experts: An expert, whose name will be reported shortly, who will make a statement on what the extent and nature of the States’ obligations are with respect to the health of persons deprived of liberty, based on international human rights law. Specifically, the expert will focus on the States’ obligations in the case of