sufferings and in that vein, establish a plan for medical and psychological care, drafted by professionals from specialized health institutions. The State shall report to the Court on: a) the medical-psychological profile of the victims, derived from the specialist’s evaluation, b) the treatment plan that the beneficiary will follow, and c) the appropriate measures that will put the plan in action. J. Obligation to pay Félix Vicente Anzualdo Vicuña, Marly Arleny Anzualdo Castro and Rommel Darwin Anzualdo Castro the amounts determined in the Judgment, as compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, and reimbursement of costs and expenses, as it may correspond (operative paragraph fourteen). 47. The State noted, at the hearing on the monitoring of compliance, that the reason it had not covered the amounts established by the Court as compensation was not because it did not differentiate between one case and another, but rather because of a lack of resources. This, given that previously, the Supra-national Specialized Prosecutor’s Office that was in charge of following up on the cases pending before the Court, had a budget of about five million to cover the payment of reparations, but due to internal policy, it no longer had those resources, and it was taking the respective steps to provide the money. In addition, by way of a brief dated July 5, 2013, it stated that "to date, it ha[d] not complied with the orders of the Inter-American Court.” 48. In regard to this matter, the representatives requested in their brief of August 8, 2013 to "urge the State to take action in order for this measure to be implemented as soon as possible.” It is worth mention that on November 30, 2010, the representatives asked the Supra-national Special Public Prosecutor’s Office to report on these payments, and no response was given. 49. Based on the aforementioned, and given that the period established in the Judgment has expired, the Court notes that the State has not complied with the obligation, and therefore urges the State to make the payments without delay and to report to the Court on the matter. *** 50. Lastly, the Court notes that since several deadlines established in the judgment have expired, it is essential that the State promptly and comprehensively report on the measures taken to fully comply with its obligations as per the Judgment (supra Considering clause seven). THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, in exercise of its authority to monitor compliance with its judgments under Articles 33, 62(1), 62(3), 65, 67, and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, 30 of its Statute and 31(2) and 69 of its Rules of Procedure, 13