that person did not provide any relevant information. 105 Also, according to Mr. Jaime Antonio Omeara the person identified with the alias "Rambo" visited their home "[...] and he asked if the Omeara family was in" reporting "that he was from the UNASE group and was investigating the disappearance of MANUEL GUILLERMO."106 According to Mr. Jaime Antonio Omeara, his sister-in-law FABIOLA arrived at that moment and told "Rambo" "why do you want to know something if you are complicit in the disappearance of GUILLERMO? [...] He said he was the authority and I told him that whether he was the authority or not, I did not want to see him there, he left the house, started up his bike and left [...].”107 72. On September 22, 1994, a telephone call was received at the DAS of Aguachica detailing the location of Guillermo Manuel Omeara Miraval’s body.108 73. On September 23, 1994, the Nineteenth Delegated Prosecutor, a coroner and DAS officials, travelled to a location around the "La Granja" farm and found Manuel Guillermo Omeara’s body.109 The body was discovered "in a ‘supine’ position, with the hands tied with thin black nylon towards the rear behind the back. A black scarf with the initials ‘ACG’ was found beside the body, with the flag of Colombia and two crossed rifles." 110 The details of the exhumation recorded that the body had been buried for more than eight days. Present at the exhumation were José Miguel Miraval (his uncle), Fabiola Álvarez Lozano and María Omeara Carrascal (his aunt), who identified the body of Manuel Guillermo Omeara.111 [… continuation] 104 Deputy Sergeant Javier Álvarez Omeara. See Report No. 0775-UNPJ-GDH of December 26, 1995 of the National Prosecutor’s Office - Technical Investigation Corps National Department – National Judicial Police Unit, case file No. 015 of the National Human Rights Unit - National Prosecutor’s Office Bucaramanga, folder No. 1, pp. 383 - 387. Annex No. 48 to the petitioners’ brief of November 10, 2010. 105 In this regard, Mrs. Teresa Omeara said she had contacted him because "it was important to talk to him because I thought suddenly, he, being in the military, could help to find to my brother GUILLERMO because we felt that none of the authorities cared about looking for my brother. " In this regard, while looking for him at the Town Hall "I told him about GUILLERMO and he was like he did not know, I do not know if he knew or not, and he told me not to worry, that he was going to collaborate to see what he could do. The next day he came to my house, he came several times to my house and I found it strange that he questioned me so much about GUILLERMO, if I knew something, if I knew who had taken him and also asked about my dad, if we knew who were the perpetrators who attacked my father, I even made the mistake of telling him quite confidently, that my dad was with the UNASE and he was surprised [...] he asked me why I was asserting such things and I said it was not just me, they were the people who saw him and I told him that they were people who were still alive [...] he stayed a few days, but suddenly went away and we didn’t learn any more about him. He had told me he had been moved to Aguachica to accompany the Mayor of Aguachica, but the strange thing is that if he had been moved to Aguachica, why did he remain so little time here in Aguachica. In the days after he left Aguachica, was when GUILLERMO’s body appeared.” Sworn statement of Carmen Teresa Omeara Miraval of August 17, 2010, case file No. 015 of the National Human Rights Unit - National Prosecutor’s Office Bucaramanga, folder No. 11, . Annex No. 40 to the petitioners’ brief of November 10, 2010. 106 Sworn statement of Jaime Antonio Omeara Miraval of August 17, 2010, case file No. 015 of the National Human Rights Unit National Prosecutor’s Office Bucaramanga, folder No. 11. Annex No. 42 to the petitioners’ brief of November 10, 2010. 107 Sworn statement of Jaime Antonio Omeara Miraval of August 17, 2010, case file No. 015 of the National Human Rights Unit National Prosecutor’s Office Bucaramanga, folder No. 11, . Annex No. 42 to the petitioners’ brief of November 10, 2010. 108 Cf. Report of October 13, 1994 of the Military Forces – National Army – UNASE Group Aguachica BR5, case file No.015 of the National Human Rights Unit - National Prosecutor’s Office Bucaramanga, folder No. 1, p. 99. Annex No. 57 to the petitioners’ brief of November 10, 2010. 109 See also Luego de 27 días de desaparecido encuentran sin vida a “memo”. in: Vanguardia Liberal. Bucaramanga, September 24, 1994. Cf. Report of October 13, 1994 of the Military Forces – National Army – UNASE Group Aguachica BR5, case file No.015 of the National Human Rights Unit - National Prosecutor’s Office Bucaramanga, folder No. 1, p. 99. Annex No. 57 to the petitioners’ brief of November 10, 2010. 110 Record of exhumation of the body dated September 23, 1994, case file No. 015 National Human Rights Unit - National Prosecutor’s Office Bucaramanga, folder No. 1, pp. 41 and 42. Annex No. 50 to the petitioners’ brief of November 10, 2010. See also Report No. 066 of September 23, 1994, supplemental to Report 065 of the DAS – Santander Administration-Operational Section Aguachica, case file 008-152218 Delegate Human Rights Procurator’s Office, folder of Annexes No 1, pp. 1 and 2. Annex No. 51 to the petitioners’ brief of November 10, 2010. “also these scarves were garments we used at that time […]”. Sworn statement of Fredy Ramiro Pedraza of July 13, 2010, case file No. 015 of the National Human Rights Unit - National Prosecutor’s Office Bucaramanga, folder No. 11, pp. 95 to 98. Annex No. 4 to the petitioners’ brief of November 10, 2010. 111 Record of exhumation of the body dated September 23, 1994, case file No. 015 National Human Rights Unit - National Prosecutor’s Office Bucaramanga, folder No. 1, pp. 41 and 42. Annex No. 50 to the petitioners’ brief of November 10, 2010. See also Report No. 066 of September 23, 1994, supplemental to Report 065 of the DAS - Santander Administration-Operational Section Aguachica, case file 008-152218 Delegate Human Rights Procurator’s Office, folder of Annexes No 1, pp. 1 and 2. Annex No. 51 to the petitioners’ brief of November 10, 2010. “Also these scarves were garments we used at that time”. Regarding the AUC, sworn statement [continues …] 20