CEJIL

- Library
- Sign in

Previous 2 / 48 Next

Normal view

-2-

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Uwazi is developed by
CEJIL
Library
Login

Info
13Relationships

Search Tips

Search text

Type something in the search box to get some results.

I. INTRODUCTION OF THE CASE AND PURPOSE OF THE DISPUTE5
II PROCEDURE BEFORE THE COURT6
III JURISDICTION7
IV. PRIOR CONSIDERATION7
V. PRELIMINARY OBJECTION9
VI. EVIDENCE10
A. Documentary, testimonial and expert evidence10
B. Admission of the evidence10
C. Evaluation of the evidence11
VII. FACTS11
A. The deaths of Ms. Tarazona Arrieta and Ms. Pérez Chávez and the injuries suffered by Mr. Bejarano Laura11
B. The investigation into the facts of the case (August 9, 1994 to May 22, 1995)12
C. The sending of the case to the archive (June 14, 1995 to September 11, 2003)15
D. The removal of the file of the case from the archive (“desarchivamiento”) (April 19, 2001 to January 21, 2003)17
E. The trial and conviction of Sgt. Evangelista Pinedo (January 21, 2003 to July 23, 2008)18
F. The serving of the full sentence and the reparations to the alleged victims (July 23, 2008 to January 6, 2011)21
VIII. MERITS23
VIII-1. THE RIGHTS TO JUDICIAL GUARANTEES AND TO JUDICIAL PROTECTION23
A. Arguments of the parties and of the Commission23
B. Considerations of the Court25
VIII-2. THE RIGHTS TO LIFE AND PERSONAL INTEGRITY OF ZULEMA TARAZONA ARRIETA, NORMA PÉREZ CHÁVEZ AND OF LUÍS BEJARANO LAURA (Articles 4 and 5(1) of the American Convention)31
A. Arguments of the parties and of the Commission31
B. Considerations of the Court32
VIII-3. RIGHT TO PERSONAL INTEGRITY OF THE FAMILY MEMBERS OF ZULEMA TARAZONA33
ARRIETA, NORMA PÉREZ CHÁVEZ AND OF LUÍS BEJARANO LAURA (Article 5, in relation to Article 1(1) of the Convention)34
A. Arguments of the parties and of the Commission34
B. Considerations of the Court34
VIII-4. DUTY TO ADOPT PROVISIONS OF DOMESTIC LAW IN RELATION TO THE RIGHTS TO LIFE AND PERSONAL INTEGRITY, AS WELL AS TO JUDICIAL GUARANTEES AND TO JUDICIAL PROTECTION (Article 2 of the American Convention, in relation to Articles 4, 5, 8 and 25)35
A. Arguments of the parties and of the Commission35
B. Considerations of the Court36
IX. REPARATIONS (Application of Article 63.1 of the American Convention)39
A. Injured Party40
B. Obligation to investigate40
C. Measures of satisfaction41
D. Other measures requested41
E. Compensation43
F. Costs and expenses44
G. Reintegration of the expenses to the Victims’ Legal Assistance Fund45
H. Method of compliance with the payments ordered46
X. OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS46

Tarazona Arrieta y otros. Judgment. October 15, 2014

IACourt judgment

Preview

Type

Costs
Merits
Preliminary Objections
Reparations

Date: Oct 15, 2014

Mechanism

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

Number: C 286

Country

Peru

Signatories

Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot
Eduardo Vio Grossi
Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
Manuel E. Ventura Robles
Roberto de Figueiredo Caldas

Primary Documents

Tarazona Arrieta y otros. Judgment. Octuber 15, 2014.pdf
English
Download View
Tarazona Arrieta y otros. Sentença de 15 de outubro de 2014.pdf
Portuguese
ML TOC
Download View
Tarazona Arrieta y otros. Sentencia de 15 de octubre de 2014.pdf
Spanish
Download View

Supporting files

Tarazona Arrieta y otros. Sentença de 15 de outubro de 2014.docx196.66 kB

Tarazona Arrieta y otros. Sentencia de 15 de octubre de 2014.docx179.88 kB

No References

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

IACourt Documents6
- Order of the IACourt3
- Order of the President IACHR2
- Hearing1
No Label1
- Case1
Mecanismo1
- Mechanism1
País1
- Country1
Signatories4
- Judge and/or Commissioners4

Create Reference

Select relationship type

Relacionado a
CorteIDH
CIDH
Votos separados
Paises
Jueces intervinientes
País
Multi Select
Mecanismo
Firmantes
Sexo
Tipo
Firmante Voto separado
Estado
Descriptores
Geolocalización de los hechos del caso
Medidas de Protección

Search Tips

Notifications

You're all caught up

New activity will show up here.