one of the fundamental principles of contemporary international law on State responsibility. 485 In this case, the Court has considered it necessary to award different measures of reparation in order to ensure the violated rights and to redress the harm integrally. 445. It should be noted that this Court has established that reparations should have a causal nexus with the facts of the case, the violations declared, the harm proved, and the measures requested to repair the respective harm. Therefore, the Court will observe the concurrence of these factors to rule correctly and pursuant to law. 486 446. In light of the foregoing considerations on the merits of the case and the violations of the American Convention declared in Chapters VIII, IX and X, the Court will proceed to analyze the claims presented by the Commission and the representatives, as well as the arguments of the State, in light of the criteria established in its case law with regard to the nature and scope of the obligation to make reparation, in order to establish measures aimed at redressing the harm caused to the victims. 487 A) Injured party 447. The Court reiterates that, in the terms of Article 63(1) of the Convention, those who have been declared victims of the violation of any right recognized in this instrument are considered to be the injured party. Therefore, the Court considers that the “injured party” are: Willian Medina Ferreras, Lilia Jean Pierre, Luis Ney Medina, Awilda Medina, Carolina Isabel Medina, Jeanty Fils-Aimé, Janise Midi, Antonio Fils-Aimé Midi, Diane Fils-Aimé Midi, Endry Fils-Aimé Midi, Victor Jean, Marlene Mesidor, Markenson Jean, Victoria Jean, Miguel Jean, Natalie Jean, Antonio Sensión, Ana Virginia Nolasco, Reyita Antonia Sensión, Ana Lidia Sensión, Rafaelito Pérez Charles, Bersson Gelin and William Gelin, and, as victims of the violations declared in Chapters VIII, IX and X, they will be considered beneficiaries of the reparations ordered by the Court. B) Measures of integral reparation: restitution, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition 448. International case law, and in particular that of the Court, has established repeatedly that the judgment constitutes per se a form of reparation. 488 Nevertheless, considering the circumstances of the case and the harm to the victims arising from the violations of the American Convention that have declared to their detriment, the Court finds it pertinent to decide the following measures of reparation. B.1. Measures of restitution 485 Cf. Case of Velásquez Rodríguez v. Honduras. reparations and costs. Judgment of July 21, 1989. Series C No. 7, para. 25, and Case of Norín Catrimán et al. (Leaders, members and activist of the Mapuche Indigenous People) v. Chile, para. 412. 486 Cf. Case of Ticona Estrada et al. v. Bolivia. Merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of November 27, 2008. Series C No. 191, para. 110, and Case of Norín Catrimán et al. (Leaders, members and activist of the Mapuche Indigenous People) v. Chile, para. 414. 487 Cf. Case of Velásquez Rodríguez v. Honduras. reparations and costs, paras. 25 to 27, and Case of Norín Catrimán et al. (Leaders, members and activist of the Mapuche Indigenous People) v. Chile, para. 415. 488 Cf. Case of Neira Alegría et al. v. Peru. reparations and costs. Judgment of September 19, 1996. Series C No. 29, para. 56, and Case of Norín Catrimán et al. (Leaders, members and activist of the Mapuche Indigenous People) v. Chile, para. 394. 141