7 g) as regards to the submission of the first report of the State on the measures adopted to comply with the Judgment: the State has given notice of several actions that have been taken in order to comply with the measures ordered by the Court; however, it has not yet submitted its first report on compliance, and h) they requested the Court to hold a public hearing to analyze the monitoring process of the Judgment delivered in the instant case. 4. The briefs of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter "the Commission" or "the Inter-American Commission") of February 2, May 3 and August 24, 2005 and June 8, 2006, wherein it submitted its comments on the reports submitted by the State (supra Having Seen clause No. 2) and expressed, inter alia, that: a) as regards to the effective investigation into the facts: i. compliance with this measure is still pending, as well as with the measure ordering the publication of the outcome of the investigations and punishment of those responsible. The State has failed to provide specific information regarding measures adopted to effectively comply with this reparation measure; ii. it should be assessed whether, during this period, the results of the actions of the State aimed at conducting relevant investigations have made it possible to infer that, within a reasonable term, the requirements of the Tribunal will be met, and iii. the State must allow the victim "to have full access to and act in all the stages and instances of the investigation and the corresponding trial”. b) as regards to the written declaration wherein the State should acknowledge its international responsibility and apologize to the victims: the State has not apologized to Mr. Tibi and the other victims. The Commission expresses its concern for the lack of information and apparent contempt of the Judgment in this respect. c) as regards to the education and training program: the State has not created the education and training program on rules and principles for protection of human rights yet. Moreover, the Commission notes the lack of information about actions aimed at complying with this obligation, and emphasizes and reiterates how necessary and significant it is that the Court instruct the State to adopt, forthwith, measures aimed at fulfilling, in good faith, the international obligations that arise from the Judgment of the Tribunal; d) as regards to the publication of the extract of the Judgment delivered by the Court in the Official Gazette and in newspapers of national circulation in Ecuador and France: i. the Commission acknowledges that, at first, the publication was not duly made at the domestic level. The obligation was subsequently fulfilled by the State with a publication on December 17, 2004.