distress” for more than 18 years. 205 140. The Court therefore finds that Mr. Olivera experienced great suffering and anguish to the detriment of his psychological and moral integrity. In view of this, the Court orders the State to provide, free of charge, and as a priority, psychological and/or psychiatric treatment, as appropriate, for Mr. Olivera Fuentes. This must include the provision of medication and, if applicable, transportation and other directly related and necessary expenses. 206 The psychological and/or psychiatric treatment must be provided by psychologists or psychiatrists, taking into account the specific circumstances and needs of the victim, as agreed with him and after an individual evaluation. 207 In the event that such experts are not available through the general psychological and psychiatric care service of the Integral Health System or the Social Health Insurance service, the State must provide the specialized treatment at a private health center. The State will have a period of three months from the time it receives said request to effectively provide the psychological and/or psychiatric care requested. C. Measures of satisfaction 141. The Commission did not make specific requests in this regard, although it stressed the need to provide “full” reparation to the victim. 142. The representatives requested that the Peruvian State be ordered to publish the official summary of the judgment in the main newspapers with wide national circulation. In addition, they requested publication of the judgment in its entirety for one year via a link on the websites of the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights, INDECOPI and the Judiciary. 143. They also requested that the Peruvian State be ordered to hold an act of acknowledgement of responsibility and to offer apologies for the violations committed to the detriment of Mr. Olivera Fuentes, “for the discrimination he suffered due to his sexual orientation and gender expression.” They indicated that the public act should take place within one year from notification of this judgment, and be broadcast on national radio and television, as well as on social media networks and it should be attended by senior representatives of the Peruvian State, including the presidency of the Republic, the presidency of the Council of Ministers, the head of the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights, the presidency of INDECOPI and the head of the Judiciary. In addition, they requested that Mr. Olivera and his representatives be fully consulted in advance about the details of the public act, such as the date and place, as well as the message of apology. 144. The State did not raise any objection to the publication of the judgment or the official summary. Regarding a possible public act to acknowledge its responsibility, it 205 Cf. Statement of Crissthian Manuel Olivera Fuentes at the public hearing held on August 24, 2022, during the Court’s 150th Regular Session. 206 Cf. Case of Poblete Vilches et al. v. Chile. Merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of March 8, 2018. Series C No. 349, para. 231, and Case of Aroca Palma et al. v. Ecuador, supra, para. 132. 207 Cf. Case of the Dos Erres Massacre v. Guatemala. Preliminary objection, merits, reparations and costs, Series C No. 211, para. 270, and Case of Aroca Palma et al. v. Ecuador, supra, para. 132. 50