47. In light of the elements of fact and of law set forth by the parties and the nature of the matter placed before it, the IACHR finds that the allegations of the petitioner concerning the alleged arbitrary and unlawful detention of the alleged victim, his allegedly excessive preventive imprisonment, the alleged lack of judicial independence and impartiality, and the violation of the principles of the natural judge and due process could constitute possible violations of the rights enshrined in Articles 7, 8, and 25 of the American Convention with respect to Article 1.1 thereof. V. CONCLUSIONS 48. The Commission concludes that it is competent to examine the claims presented by the petitioner concerning the alleged violations of Articles 7, 8, and 25, in keeping with Article 1.1 of the American Convention, and that these are admissible under the requirements established in Articles 46 and 47 of the American Convention. 49. On the basis of the arguments of fact and of law presented above, THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS DECIDES: 1. To find this petition admissible with respect to Articles 7, 8, and 25, in connection with Article 1.1, of the American Convention. 2. To convey this decision to the State and to the petitioner. 3. To continue to examine the matter on its merits. 4. To publish this decision and include it in the Commission's Annual Report to the OAS General Assembly. Done and signed in the city of Washington, D.C., on the 29th day of the month of January, 2015. (Signed): Tracy Robinson, President; Felipe González,Second Vice President; José de Jesús Orozco Henríquez, Rosa María Ortiz, Paulo Vannuchi and James L. Cavallaro, Commissioners. 6