23 u) Luisa Fernanda Camberos Revilla. Witness proposed by the State. She testified, inter alia, about “[t]he comprehensive policy implemented by the government of the state of Chihuahua to prevent, investigate, punish and eliminate violence against women; [t]he results of the programs to prevent, investigate, punish and eliminate violence against women implemented by the government of the state of Chihuahua, and the [alleged] pecuniary and non-pecuniary support granted by the [Chihuahua Women’s] Institute to the next of kin of women victims of crime, especially the support provided to the next of kin of Claudia Ivette González, Laura Berenice Ramos Monárrez and Esmeralda Herrera Monreal.” v) María Sofía Castro Romero. Witness proposed by the State. She testified, inter alia, about “[t]he creation and functioning of the Commission to Prevent and Eliminate Violence against Women in Ciudad Juárez, [and t]he results of the intervention of this Commission in the programs to prevent and to deal with violence against women in Chihuahua, especially in Ciudad Juárez.” 84. Regarding the evidence provided during the public hearing, the Court received the testimony of the following persons: a) Josefina González Rodríguez. Mother of Claudia Ivette González and alleged victim. Witness proposed by the Commission. She testified, inter alia, about “the different steps taken by the family of [Claudia Ivette] during the period immediately following her [alleged] disappearance; the authorities’ attitude and response to these measures; the way the domestic investigations were conducted following the discovery of her daughter’s remains; the [supposed] obstacles faced by [Claudia Ivette’s] family in their search for justice in this case; [and] the [alleged] consequences for her personal life and for her family of the [alleged] human rights violations that her daughter suffered.” b) Irma Monreal Jaime. Mother of Esmeralda Herrera Monreal and alleged victim. Witness proposed by the Commission. She testified, inter alia, about “her [supposed] history of victimization owing to the [presumed] disappearance of her daughter, the measures taken; the [alleged] violations committed against her by the Mexican authorities, their response, attitude and the [alleged] harm caused; the [supposed] tortuous and convoluted procedure to identify [her daughter Esmeralda]; the conduct of the investigations; the [alleged] obstacles and the denial of justice; the management of the fund set up by the state Attorney General’s Office and the [Office of the Attorney General of the Republic]; the impact on her life and that of her family owing to the [alleged] process of victimization; the management of the other support provided by the government; the [alleged] lack of access to information; the [supposed] absence of legal support and advice to advance the investigations; the [alleged] negligence of the authorities; the process she had to follow to access the Inter-American System, [and] the [alleged] pressure exercised by the authorities.” c) Benita Monárrez Salgado. Mother of Laura Berenice Ramos Monárrez and alleged victim. Witness proposed by the Commission. She testified, inter alia, about “her [supposed] history of victimization owing to the [presumed] disappearance of her daughter, the measures taken, the [alleged] violations she suffered from the Mexican authorities, their