7 27. On September 11, 1995, Argentina accepted the facts set forth by the Commission in Section II of the application. Those facts are summarized in paragraphs ten through nineteen of the instant judgment. Argentina also accepted the legal consequences that derive from the facts cited (supra para. 24) Likewise, this State fully accepted its international responsibility in the present case. (supra para. 25) Given the acceptance made by Argentina, the Court determines that there is no controversy between the parties as to the facts that gave rise to the instant case, nor as to international responsibility. VIII 28. The Court determines that it is now time to decide on the procedures to be followed on the subject of reparations and compensation in the present case. In this regard, the Government has requested of the Court, “the suspension of the proceedings” for a period of six months for the purpose of reaching an agreement. The nature of proceedings before a human rights court does not permit the parties to withdraw from the application of set procedural rules, even by mutual agreement, since they are by nature of a public procedural order. 29. Given the current conversations between the Government, the Commission, and the representatives of the victims, to which the interested parties made reference during the hearing of February 1, 1996, and in the briefs submitted to the Court before the hearing, it appears appropriate to grant them a period of six months to reach an agreement on reparations and compensation. 30. The Court must point out the difference between the suspension of a proceeding, which is inadmissible, and the granting of a period to reach an agreement on reparations and compensation, as this Court has done in some earlier cases. The latter is within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, and, in the present case may be an adequate way to reach an agreement on reparations and compensation. IX 31. Now, therefore, THE COURT,