2 1. [It ordered] the State of Ecuador not to collect the fine levied on Mr. Rafael Iván Suárez Rosero and to remove his name from both the Register of Criminal Records, as well as from the Register maintained by the National Council on Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, as to the facts concerned in the present proceeding, in accordance with the terms of paragraph 76 of [the] judgment. unanimously 2. [It ordered] the State of Ecuador to pay, in the manner and under the conditions set forth in paragraphs 101 to 112 of [the] judgment, a total amount of US$ 86,621.77 (eighty-six thousand, six hundred twenty-one dollars of the United States of America and seventy-seven cents) or its equivalent in Ecuadorian currency, distributed in the following manner: a. US$53,104.77 (fifty-three thousand, one hundred four dollars of the United States of America and seventy-seven cents) or the equivalent in Ecuadorian currency to Mr. Rafael Iván Suárez Rosero; b. US$23,517.00 (twenty-three thousand, five hundred seventeen dollars of the United States of America) or the equivalent in Ecuadorian currency to Mrs. Margarita Ramadán Burbano; and c. US$10,000.00 (ten thousand dollars of the United States of America) or the equivalent in Ecuadorian currency to the minor Micaela Suárez Ramadán. unanimously 3. [It ordered] the State of Ecuador to pay for costs and expenses, in the manner and conditions prescribed in paragraphs 101 to 112 of this judgment, the sum of US$ 6,520.00 (six thousand, five hundred twenty dollars of the United States of America), or the equivalent in Ecuadorian currency, to Alejandro Ponce Villacís, and the sum of US$ 6,010.45 (six thousand, ten dollars of the United States of America and forty-five cents), or the equivalent in Ecuadorian currency to Richard Wilson. unanimously 4. [It ordered] the State of Ecuador to apply the following rules to the payments set forth in the [...] judgment: a. the payment of the lost wages ordered in the second operative paragraph (part a), will be exempt from any deduction other than those made by the Court when it made the respective calculations, in accordance with paragraph 55(A)(a) of the [...] judgment; and b. the payments ordered shall be exempt from any existing or future tax or duty. unanimously 5. [It decided] to supervise fulfillment of this Judgment. 3. The judgment on interpretation of the judgment on reparations delivered on May 29, 1999, by which it was unanimously decided: 1. That the request filed by the State of Ecuador for interpretation of the January 20, 1999 Judgment delivered in the Suárez Rosero Case [was] admissible. 2. That the sums that the Court ordered in the judgment in question for Mr. Rafael Iván Suárez Rosero and Mrs. Margarita Ramadán de Suárez sh[ould] be paid promptly and in full. It [was] incumbent upon the State to exhaust all measures to ensure prompt and efficient fulfillment of this obligation, under the conditions and within the time limits established in that judgment and, in particular, to adopt suitable measures to ensure that the legal deductions that Ecuadorian financial institutions charge on all monetary transactions shall not abridge the beneficiaries’ right to receive the full amounts ordered for them.