92. As it has in other cases,107 the Court orders the State to publish the following, within six months of notification of this judgment and in a font that is legible and appropriate: (a) the official summary of this judgment prepared by the Court, once, in the Official Gazette and in a newspaper with national circulation, and (b) this judgment in its entirety, available for one year, on the official website of the Judiciary of Costa Rica and the Ministry of Finance, accessible to the public and from the home page of the website. The state must inform this Court immediately when it has made each of the publications ordered, irrespective of the one-year timeframe for presenting its first report established in the ninth operative paragraph of this judgment. D. Guarantee of non-repetition D.1. Requests of the Commission and the parties 93. The Commission asked that the state be ordered to adopt necessary measures of non-repetition to prevent similar incidents from taking place in the future. Specifically, it asked that the state be ordered to adopt legislative, administrative, and other measures to prevent discrimination based on disability and promote the workplace inclusion of persons with disabilities. In this framework, it asked that the state conduct training programs for public servants and justice officials on the prohibition of discrimination based on disability in the workplace and on the obligation to adopt positive measures to guarantee that persons with disabilities have access to the workplace and can remain in it. 94. The state indicated that it had carried out training and awareness-raising programs from the Office of the Vice President of the Republic and the Office of the President of the Judicial Branch. It also indicated that, to implement the recommendations of the Commission’s Report on the Merits, it had developed a recruitment course for positions reserved for officials involved in personnel recruitment and selection processes. In addition, it held a seminar titled "Disability and Human Rights: Current Status and Challenges for 2021," which was attended by more than 100 public servants. With regard to the Judiciary, it reported that two workshops have been held, underscoring that their content addressed employment discrimination based on disability. D.2. Considerations of the Court 95. This Court views positively the efforts made by the State to train public officials on equality and nondiscrimination. However, this Court deems it pertinent to adopt specific training programs aimed at preventing the repetition of facts similar to what happened in this case, based on the aspects addressed in the judgment. In this regard, the Court orders the state to, within one year, implement educational and training programs on equality and nondiscrimination for persons with disabilities for officials of the Ministry of Finance over a period of three years. Specifically, these programs should address the essential content of state obligations to respect and guarantee the right to work of persons with disabilities in hiring, selection, promotion, and dismissal, as well as the special duties arising when handling allegations of acts of discrimination based on disability. Cf. Case of Cantoral Benavides v. Peru. Reparations and Costs. Judgment of December 3, 2001. Series C No. 88, para. 79; and Case of Pavez Pavez v. Chile, supra, para. 168. 107 29