CEJIL

- Library
- Sign in

I/A Court HR. Case of Sales Pimenta v. Brazil. Preliminary objections, merits, reparations, and costs. Judgment of June 30, 2022. Judgment adopted in San José, Costa Rica. Ricardo C. Pérez Manrique President Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot Nancy Hernández López Verónica Gómez Patricia Pérez Goldberg Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Registrar So ordered, Ricardo C. Pérez Manrique President Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Registrar 53

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Uwazi is developed by
CEJIL
Library
Login

Info
14Relationships

Search Tips

Search text

Type something in the search box to get some results.

I INTRODUCTION OF THE CASE AND CAUSE OF ACTION4
II PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT5
III JURISDICTION7
IV PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS7
A. Lack of ratione temporis jurisdiction with respect to events that occurred prior to the date of recognition of the Court’s jurisdiction7
A.1. Arguments of the parties and the Commission7
A.2. Considerations of the Court8
B. Preliminary objection regarding the failure to exhaust domestic remedies8
B.1. Arguments of the parties and the Commission8
B.2. Considerations of the Court9
C. Lack of ratione materiae jurisdiction over the violation of the principle of subsidiarity (fourth instance objection)10
C.1. Arguments of the parties and the Commission10
C.2. Considerations of the Court10
V PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS10
VI EVIDENCE 11
A. Admissibility of the documentary evidence11
B. Admissibility of the testimonial and expert evidence12
VII FACTS12
A. Context of violence and impunity related to land struggles in Brazil12
B. Background information15
C. Independent events after the recognition of the Court’s contentious jurisdiction19
VIII MERITS22
VIII-1 RIGHTS TO JUDICIAL GUARANTEES AND JUDICIAL PROTECTION, AS WELL AS THE RIGHT TO THE TRUTH, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE OBLIGATION TO RESPECT AND ENSURE RIGHTS23
A. Arguments of the parties and of the Commission23
B. Considerations of the Court25
VIII-2 RIGHT TO PERSONAL INTEGRITY, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE DUTY TO RESPECT AND ENSURE RIGHTS34
A. Arguments of the parties and of the Commission34
B. Considerations of the Court34
IX REPARATIONS36
A. Injured Party37
B. Obligation to investigate the facts and identify, prosecute, and, as appropriate, punish those responsible37
C. Measure of rehabilitation38
D. Measures of satisfaction39
E. Guarantees of non-repetition41
F. Compensation47
G. Costs and expenses49
H. Method of compliance with the payments ordered50
X OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS51
THE COURT DECIDES:51
DECLARES,51
AND ESTABLISHES,51

Sales Pimenta. Judgment. June 30, 2022

IACourt judgment

Preview

Type

Costs
Merits
Preliminary Objections
Reparations

Date: Jun 30, 2022

Mechanism

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

Number: C 454

Country

Brazil

Signatories

Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot
Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
Nancy Hernández López
Patricia Pérez Goldberg
Ricardo C. Pérez Manrique
Verónica Gómez

Primary Documents

Sales Pimenta. Judgment. June 30, 2022.pdf
English
Download View
Sales Pimenta. Sentencia de 30 de junio de 2022.pdf
Spanish
Download View

Supporting files

Sales Pimenta. Judgment. June 30, 2022.docx180.23 kB

Sales Pimenta. Sentencia de 30 de junio de 2022.docx234.41 kB

No References

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

No Label1
- Case1
IACourt Documents5
- Order of the President IACHR1
- Hearing2
- IACourt judgment1
- Order of the IACourt1
Mecanismo1
- Mechanism1
País1
- Country1
Signatories6
- Judge and/or Commissioners6

Create Reference

Select relationship type

Relacionado a
CorteIDH
CIDH
Votos separados
Paises
Jueces intervinientes
País
Multi Select
Mecanismo
Firmantes
Sexo
Tipo
Firmante Voto separado
Estado
Descriptores
Geolocalización de los hechos del caso
Medidas de Protección

Search Tips

Connect to a paragraph

Connect to an entity

Disable highlights

Add to table of contents

Notifications

You're all caught up

New activity will show up here.