2 the manner set forth in paragraphs 161, 171, 172, 174, 177, 180 to 183, 205 and 206 to 209 thereof. […] 15. The Court shall monitor the total compliance with [the] Judgment, and it shall deem the instant case adjudged once the State has totally complied with the provisions thereof. Within the term of one year from the notice of [the] Judgment, the State shall submit a report on the measures adopted in order to comply with it before the Court, in the terms of paragraph 210 of the […] Judgment. 2. The Judgment of interpretation of the Judgment on the preliminary objection, merits, reparations and costs (hereinafter referred to as “the Judgment of Interpretation”), issued by the Inter-American Court on January 28, 2008. 3. The Order of monitoring of compliance with the Judgment rendered by the Inter-American Court on April 28, 2009, whereby it declared: 1. That pursuant to what has been stated in Considering clauses No. eight to thirteen of the […] Order, the State has failed to comply with its obligation to inform this Court on the measures adopted in order to fulfill the Judgment […] 2. That it shall keep the monitoring proceedings open with regard to the totality of the operative paragraphs of the Judgment […], reserving the authority to eventually call for a hearing of monitoring of compliance in order to assess the fulfillment of said Order. AND DECID[ED] 1. To request the State to adopt all the measures necessary to effectively and immediately comply with the totality of the operative paragraphs of the Judgment […] in the instant case, in accordance with the content of the […] Order, and with Article 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights. 2. To request the State to submit before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, no later than June 1, 2009, its first report in which it describes all the measures adopted in order to comply with what has been ordered by the Court. […] 4. The brief dated June 10, 2009 and the appendixes thereto, whereby the Peruvian Republic (hereinafter referred to as “the State” or “Peru”) provided information on the progress of the compliance with the above mentioned Judgment. 5. The brief dated July 10, 2009 and the appendixes thereto, whereby the victims representatives (hereinafter referred to as “the representatives”) presented their observations regarding the information forwarded by the State.