14 officer Juan Hilaquita Quispe who had assaulted him on January 23, 2001 and had caused the injury to his head and right eye. He told her that the former had threatened him if he reported this, which is why he had not told the truth the first time that he went to the infirmary.27 He indicated that when Dr. Chang reported these details to Commander Torres, he called Mr. Quispealaya and later noncommissioned officer Hilaquita, who denied all of the allegations. They stated that Commander Torres asked the officials in the Inspector’s Office to begin the pertinent administrative investigations.28 However, the IACHR has not been Reportd about the result of these investigations. 57. On July 6, 2001, Dr. Chang sent the Brigade General of Huancayo Mr. Quispealaya Vilcapoma’s medical report, which indicated that he had received attention on June 27, 2001 as an outpatient “because he had pain in the left front ocular region produced by the blow from an FAL dealt by soldier Hilaquita Quispe in February of 2001,” and that the pain had increased to become unbearable and that the sharpness of vision had diminished.29 Similarly, the medical report stated that Mr. Quispealaya had gone to the Hospital Daniel A. Carrión on July 3, 2001, where the Specialist diagnosed “ptisis bulbi in the right eye, ametropia in the right eye,” for which the patient was hospitalized while arrangements were made for his evacuation to the Central Military Hospital in Lima.30 58. The petitioners complained to the Attorney General that given the serious state of Mr. Quispealaya’s health, he was transferred to the Central Military Hospital in Lima, where despite receiving surgery in his right eye, he lost vision in that eye. They stated that after the operation, Mr. Quispealaya was assigned to the recovery ward of the Military Hospital.31 Mr. Quispealaya was admitted to the Central Military Hospital in Lima on July 14, 2001 and was released on September 5, 2002.32 With regard to the treatment he received, it was indicated that this included “extraction of the cataract, implantation of an intra-ocular lens and trabeculectomia in the right eye.”33 27 Annex 2. Complaint presented by the Human Rights Commission (COMISEDH) for the commission of the crime against the person-physical and psychological torture before the Office of Public Prosecutions, received by the Parties’ Roundtable of the Office of Public Prosecutions (Mesa de Partes de la Fiscalía de la Nación) on February 28, 2002. Annex 15 to the petitioners’ Communications of February 5, 2006. 28 Annex 2. Complaint presented by the Human Rights Commission (COMISEDH) for the commission of the crime against the person-physical and psychological torture before the Office of Public Prosecutions, received by the Parties’ Roundtable of the Office of Public Prosecutions (Mesa de Partes de la Fiscalía de la Nación) on February 28, 2002. Annex 15 to the petitioners’ Communications of February 5, 2006. 29 Annex 7. Report signed by Patricia R. Chanjan Pino, Medical Surgeon, Huancayo, July 6, 2001. Annex 6 of the petitioners’ communication of February 5, 2006. 30 Annex 7. Report signed by Patricia R. Chanjan Pino, Medical Surgeon, Huancayo, July 6, 2001. Annex 6 of the petitioners’ communication of February 5, 2006. 31 Annex 2. Complaint presented by the Human Rights Commission (COMISEDH) for the commission of the crime against the person-physical and psychological torture before the Office of Public Prosecutions, received by the Parties’ Roundtable of the Office of Public Prosecutions (Mesa de Partes de la Fiscalía de la Nación) on February 28, 2002. Annex 15 to the petitioners’ Communications of February 5, 2006. 32 Annex 11. Medical Report signed by Felix Zapana on September 28, 2002. Annex 9 to the petitioners’ communication of February 5, 2006. 33 Annex 11. Medical Report signed by Felix Zapana on September 28, 2002. Annex 9 to the petitioners’ communication of February 5, 2006.