2 b) c) d) US$44,333.00 (forty-four thousand three hundred and thirty-three United States dollars), or their equivalent in Argentinean currency, to [...] María Ramona Armas de Bulacio under the terms of paragraphs 95 to 104 and 157 to 159 of the […] Judgment; US$39,333.00 (thirty-nine thousand three hundred and thirty-three United States dollars), or their equivalent in Argentinean currency, to […] Lorena Beatriz Bulacio under the terms of paragraphs 95 to 104 and 157 to 159 of the […] Judgment; and US$12,000.00 (twelve thousand United States dollars), or their equivalent in Argentinean currency, […] distributed in equal parts between the children Matías Emanuel and Tamara Florencia Bulacio under the terms of paragraphs 104 [and] 157 to 160 of the […] Judgment[;] 9. […] pay the total sum of US$40,000.00 (forty thousand United States dollars), or their equivalent in Argentinean currency, for costs and expenses, under the terms of paragraphs 152 and 157 to 159 of the […] Judgment[, and] 10. […] pay such compensation and reimburse such costs and expenditures as ordered in the […] Judgment within six months from the notification thereof. […] 2. The Order of the Inter-American Court of November 17, 2004 on compliance with the Judgment, whereby the Court declared: 1. [t]hat the State ha[d] fully complied with the requirements in operative paragraphs six to thirteen of the Judgment […] as to publication of said Judgment, and compensation for material damages, immaterial damages, and costs and expenditures[, and] 2. [t]hat it [would] maintain open the procedure of supervision of compliance with the requirements indicated in considering paragraph ten of [the] Order. […] 3. The communications of November 30, 2004; January 31 and February 24, 2005; March 15, 2006; May 14, June 13, and July 16 and 26, 2007; July 14, August 5 and 14, and October 3, 2008; whereby the State addressed the matter of compliance with the Judgment. 4. The briefs of March 7, 2005; January 3 and April 17, 2006; June 12, July 13 and 20, and September 20, 2007; and August 14, September 8, and October 31, 2008, whereby the representatives of the victim and his next of kin (hereinafter, “the representatives”) submitted their comments on the status of compliance with the Judgment. 5. The communications of June 16, 2005; May 3, 2006; June 26 and September 17, 2007, and September 26 and November 19, 2008, whereby the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter, “the Commission” or “the Inter-American Commission”) submitted its comments regarding the status of compliance with the Judgment. 6. The private hearing that took place on August 14, 2008 during the XXXV Special Session of the Inter-American Court in the city of Montevideo, in the Republic of Uruguay, at which the State, the Inter-American Commission and the representatives addressed the aspects that are yet to be complied with in the instant case. After the private hearing on monitoring compliance with the Judgment and at the Inter-American Court’s proposal, the parties signed an agreement that was submitted to the Court, whereby it was agreed as follows: [a.] In the light of Section 1 of Resolution No. 2209, passed by the Minister of Justice, Security and Human Rights on August 12, 2008, instructing the Human Rights Secretary to set up the consultation mechanism provided for in item 3 of the Friendly Settlement Agreement