to the obligations established in Article 1(1) of the same instrument, to the detriment of Fredy Núñez Naranjo, derived from his alleged forced disappearance. b) The violation of the obligations not to practice, permit, or tolerate the forced disappearance of persons, provided for in Article I a) of the Inter-American Convention on Forced Disappearance, to the detriment of Fredy Núñez Naranjo. c) The violation of the obligation to search for individuals who have allegedly been victims of forced disappearance, derived from Articles 8(1) and 25(1) of the American Convention in relation to Article 1(1) of the same instrument, to the detriment of Fredy Núñez Naranjo and his family members. d) The violation of the obligation to punish within their jurisdictions, those persons who commit or attempt to commit the crime of forced disappearance of persons and their accomplices and accessories, as provided in Article I b) of the Inter-American Convention on Forced Disappearance, to the detriment of Fredy Núñez Naranjo and his family members. d) The violation of the right to humane treatment established in Article 5(1) of the American Convention in relation to the obligations established in Article 1(1) of the same instrument, to the detriment of Sixto Núñez, María Gregoria Naranjo, Marcia and Silvia Núñez Naranjo - parents and sisters of Fredy Núñez Naranjo -, as a result of the pain, anguish, and uncertainty derived from the alleged forced disappearance of the latter and the lack of clarification about what happened. e) The violation of the rights to a fair trial and to judicial protection established in Articles 8(1) and 25(1) of the American Convention in relation to Article 1(1) of the same instrument, to the detriment of María Gregoria Naranjo and Silvia Núñez Naranjo, due to the lack of an investigation aimed at determining and punishing those responsible for the injuries that they allegedly suffered. B.3 Reparations 28. Despite having partially acknowledged its international responsibility, the State requested that the Court not order reparations. In this sense, this Court notes that the dispute regarding the measures requested under this title persists, as indicated above, so it will issue a ruling in this regard in accordance with Article 63 of the American Convention. B.4 Conclusions: Assessment of partial acknowledgement of responsibility 29. The Court verifies that the acknowledgement of responsibility made by the State is partial as it specifically refers to the violations of Articles 8(1) and 25(1) in relation to Article 1(1) of the American Convention, due to the insufficient actions of the national authorities responsible for investigating and punishing those responsible for the kidnapping Mr. Núñez Naranjo from the police station and his subsequent disappearance. 30. The Court values this admission as it constitutes a positive contribution to the advancement of this process. In these terms, the partial admission of international responsibility made by the Ecuadorian State produces full legal effects in accordance with Articles 62 and 64 of the Rules. -9-