Inspectorate of the Leoncio Prado Detachment; (c) the military disciplinary proceedings; (d) the ordinary criminal proceedings; and (e) the military criminal proceedings. A. Regarding the alleged victim and background of the proceedings against him 40. The alleged victim, Jorge Rosadio Villavicencio, held the position of Intelligence Lieutenant of the Army of Peru as of January 1, 1990. 28 On June 30, 1994, Mr. Rosadio Villavicencio was assigned to the Fifth Military Region, Leoncio Prado Detachment, Intelligence Company No. 341 in the Sión area.29 He was Chief of the Leoncio Prado Detachment as of August 5, 1994,30 date on which he was transferred to the Sión Countersubversive Base. 31 3 41. Mr. Rosadio Villavicencio was given instructions to carry out a mission by Colonel EM,32 also known as “Colonel Jano” or “Colonel Jemo,”33 who at that time was Chief of the Army General Staff Office of the Leoncio Prado Detachment.34 As part of the mission, Mr. Rosadio Villavicencio had to identify drug traffickers that operated in the area and pretend to be a corrupt official, accept money in exchange for authorizing drug-trafficking flights from the base, and later seize the drugs and capture the drug traffickers.35 42. While carrying out the operation, Mr. Rosadio Villavicencio authorized three drug-trafficking flights on August 17, 24 and 31, 1994, on the Sión landing strip, for which he received USD 28 5). Cf. Order of the General Commander of the Army Personnel Command of January 1, 1994. (Evidence file, folio Cf. Memorandum No. 296 of the Chief of Army Personnel Management to Jorge Rosadio Villavicencio, June 30, 1994. (Evidence file, folio 7). 30 Cf. Statement of Jorge Enrique Rosadio Villavicencio before the Examining Judge, September 15, 1994. (Evidence file, folio 25). 31 Cf. Minutes of the Investigative Council for Junior Officers, Session No. 007-95, February 7, 1995. (Evidence file, folio 55). 32 Cf. Minutes of the hearing of the oral proceedings of March 12, 1996 (evidence file, folios 10 and 14); Cf. Statement of Colonel M before the Examining Judge of September 22, 1994 (evidence file, folios 34 and 35). 33 As can be inferred from the minutes of the hearing of the oral proceedings of March 12, 1996, Colonel EM was also known by the aliases “Colonel JANO” or “Colonel JEMO”. Cf. Minutes of the hearing of the oral proceedings of March 12, 1996 (evidence file, folios 9, 10 and 14). 34 Cf. Statement of Jorge Enrique Rosadio Villavicencio before the Examining Judge of September 15, 1994 (evidence file, folio 25). 35 The parties to the case disagree on: (i) the nature of the mission, whether it was an intelligence operation or an anti-drug trafficking operation; (ii) the scope, whether the second flight had to be seized or the number of flights to be authorized was not specified; and (iii) the distribution of money received as bribes; meaning, whether Mr. Rosadio had to keep it or if he had to send it to the detachment. According to the victim, it was an intelligence mission that “consisted in identifying drug traffickers in the area, capturing a small aircraft and seizing the drugs, for which I had to present myself as a corrupt officer colluding with drug trafficking, to be able to fulfill the mission that I was assigned, which I carried out until September 5, 1994.” Cf. Statement of Jorge Enrique Rosadio Villavicencio before the Examining Judge of September 15, 1994 (evidence file, folio 25). In order to protect himself from any irregularities in the execution of the operation, he created the document “Angel Operation Plan,” which contained all of the instructions provided to him. According to the document, the plan consisted of five steps to be carried out by the implementing officer: (i) step one was to present himself as a corrupt official and accept invitations, gifts and money from drug traffickers, without letting the troops know that he was working in an intelligence team; (ii) step two was to identify how small aircraft loaded with drugs entered the area and the activities at the time of exchange of drugs for money; (iii) step three was for the official to authorize drugtrafficking flights in exchange for payment; (iv) step four was to change the staff at the base; (v) the last step was to capture the drug traffickers. In addition, part of the money seized in the operation had to be taken to the general base of the Leoncio Prado detachment to pay the troop that had provided the information and collaborated in the operation. Cf. Copy of “Angel Operation Plan” of August 1994 (evidence file, folios 9-11, 21-23). This document was sent for approval to the High Command. On the other hand, the State indicated that Mr. Rosadio Villavicencio “was appointed by his Command, in compliance with that set forth in the ‘Cleaning 94’ Operation Plan, to perform an anti-drug trafficking operation; he was named Chief of the Base, and his mission was to discover, dismantle and capture the drug trafficking organizations that operated in the area of Sión, as well as to capture a light aircraft and seize drugs, money and inputs used for its creation. To be able to fulfill the aforementioned tasks, the alleged victim had to earn the trust of the drug trafficking organizations and the compromised troops, accept the bribe to perform a flight and distribute the money among the personnel of the base to prevent suspicions, and as to the portion corresponding to him, he would retain it and draft a report to send it to the Leoncio Prado detachment. In the second flight, the light aircraft, drugs and other had to be seized.” 29 12