2012, starting at 9 a.m., to receive their final oral arguments and final oral observations, respectively, on the preliminary objections and eventual merits, reparations and costs, as well as to receive the statements and expert opinions of the following: A) Presumed victim proposed by the representative: 1) Stella Maris Fernández, who will testify about: the supposed impact of the life sentence on the personal life and relationships of her son Ricardo David Videla Fernández, and on family life; about the supposed consequences of the death of her son, the presumed failure to clarify what happened; and about her expectations concerning the judgment of the Inter-American Court. B) Expert witness proposed by the Inter-American Commission 2) Miguel Cillero Bruñol, who will provide an expert opinion on: the international human rights standards concerning juvenile criminal justice, including the principle of the specificity of the applicable substantive and procedural norms; the imposing of deprivation of liberty as a measure of last resort and for the shortest time possible, and the inadmissibility of imposing life sentences on adolescents with a disproportionate amount of time passing before release. He will also refer to Argentina’s legal framework for juvenile criminal justice in light of the said standards. C) Expert witness proposed by the representative: 3) Sofía Tiscornia, who will provide an expert opinion on: the supposed impact of life imprisonment on the life of children and adolescents, including their affective and social ties and their education and vocational training. In addition, she will refer to the supposed practice of detention centers of systematically transferring persons deprived of liberty, and the consequences of this practice in relation to the declared purposes of prison sentences. Lastly, she will refer to the supposed effects of this type of sentence on the families of those convicted. 6. To call upon the Argentine Republic to facilitate the exit from and entry into its territory of the deponents and expert witnesses, if they reside or are in that country, who have been summoned in this Order to testify and provide expert opinions at the public hearing on preliminary objections and eventual merits, reparations and costs in this case, in accordance with the provisions of Article 26(1) of the Court’s Rules of Procedure. 7. To require the Inter-American Commission and the representative to communicate this Order to the persons they have proposed and who have been summoned to testify and provide expert opinions, in accordance with the provisions of Article 50(2) and 50(4) of the Rules of Procedure. 8. To inform the Inter-American Commission and the representative that they must cover the costs arising from producing or contributing the evidence they propose, in accordance with the provisions of Article 60 of the Rules of Procedure, notwithstanding the provisions of considering paragraphs 24 to 27 of this Order. Additionally, to require the representative to forward an estimate of the cost of preparing and notarizing the expert opinions of Liliana Gimol Pinto and Laura Dolores Sobredo, and the statement of Marta Graciela Olguín in Argentina, and forwarding them to the Court by August 8, 2012, at the latest. 13