4 i. the State has complied with its obligations to pay the compensation awarded in the instant case to Ms. De La Cruz Flores and her next of kin; ii. it has established a trust fund in the name of the minor, Danilo Alfredo Blanco De La Cruz, in the amount of USD30,000, and iii. has reimbursed Ms. De La Cruz Flores for costs and expenses. c) in regards to the duty to provide medical and psychological care to the victim through the State’s health services, including the provision of free medication, the State did not provide any information. d) in regards to the obligation to reinstate Ms. De La Cruz Flores to the job she was performing as a medical professional in public institutions at the time of her detention: i. Ms. De la Cruz currently holds the position of general doctor; Level P-1, receiving a salary equivalent to the one she earned at the time of her detention; ii. although Ms. De La Cruz Flores states that she has not been reinstated to the Pediatric Unit, it does not constitute non-compliance with the measures ordered by this Court in the Judgment. At the time of her detention, Ms. De La Cruz was working as a general doctor, and there is no record of any specialized degree in pediatrics in her file. Therefore, ESSALUD, the Peruvian Social Health Insurance, is not required to reassign her to a position in which she is not a specialist, and iii. the State has complied with this obligation through ESSALUD, insofar as the Judgment orders that she be reinstated to a similar position and not necessarily to the same position she held, which is impossible given the amount of time that has elapsed and the vacancies available. e) in regards to the duty to provide Ms. De La Cruz Flores with a grant for training and professional development, the State did not provide any information. f) in regards to the duty to re-enter Ms. De La Cruz Flores in the relevant retirement register, the State did not provide any information. g) in regards to the obligation to publish the section entitled “Proven Facts” as well as operative paragraphs 1 to 3 of the declaratory part of the Judgment in the Official Gazette and in another daily newspaper with national circulation, the State published the pertinent sections of the Judgment in El Comercio newspaper, a nationwide newspaper, on December 30, 2005. 3. The communications submitted by the representative of the victim (hereinafter “the representative”) on February 2, 2005, April 29, 2005, June 20, 2005, May 18, 2006, July 13, 2006, August 2, 2006, August 8, 2006, September 20, 2006, December 21, 2006, February 24, 2007, and October 19, 2007 stating, inter alia, that: