52. The Commission considers that the petitioner's allegations relating to the violation of his rights to personal liberty, to a fair trial and to judicial protection, if confirmed, could characterize a violation of the rights protected by Articles 7, 8, 24 and 25 of the Convention taken in relation to Articles 1(1) and 2 of that instrument. Moreover, there is no evidence that the complaint submitted is groundless or that it is out of order. Consequently, the Commission considers that the requirements of Article 47(b) and (c) of the Convention are satisfied. 53. With respect to the alleged violation of Article 10 of the Convention, which protects the right to compensation for judicial error, the Commission considers that the evidence at hand does not characterize a violation of that right, because the petitioner was never the subject of a final decision of conviction. However, the Commission will deal with the question of compensation that might be due for the prolonged deprivation of liberty to which the petitioner claims he was subjected in its analysis of the merits. 54. In his initial submission of September 9, 1997, the petitioner also claimed violation of the rights protected by Articles 3, 5, 9, 11, 13, 16 and 22 of the American Convention. In his note of September 19, 1999, he also held that the Government violated Articles 17 and 19 of the Convention to the prejudice of his family. Nevertheless, in his subsequent presentations, Mr. Jenkins made no allusion to such violations by the Argentine State, nor did he provide any factual or legal basis to demonstrate them. Consequently, the Commission concludes from its analysis of the facts contained in the petition that they fail to characterize such violations. V. CONCLUSION 55. The Commission concludes that it is competent to examine the case and that the petition is admissible, pursuant to Articles 46 and 47 of the American Convention. 56. In light of the arguments of fact and law set forth above, and without prejudging the merits, THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, DECIDES: 12