-2-
5.
The brief submitted by the State on October 25, 2006, stating, inter alia, that:
a)
by means of a decision rendered on February 15, 2005, the Corte
Suprema (Guatemalan Supreme Court) “ordered the temporary stay of
execution of […] Bernardino Rodríguez-Lara and Pablo Arturo Ruiz-Almengor’s
death sentences;”
b)
Mr. Ruiz-Almengor “was transferred to the Zone 18 Detention Center for
Men from the Escuintla maximum security prison, in the custody of the Juzgado
Primero de Ejecución Penal (First Court of Criminal Sentence Execution) for the
crimes of escape, kidnapping or abduction[; he i]s being held in a cell of
approximately two by three meters; his health status is stable and is not taking
any special medication; the cell contains a mattress and blankets[;] he receives
balanced meals three times a day, does handicraft work, displays good behavior
toward inmates and prison staff, receives visits on Thursdays, [and] his cell has
natural ventilation and natural and artificial light,” and
c)
Mr. Rodríguez-Lara “is being held in Sector B-3 of the Escuintla
Maximum Security Center. His health status is stable and is not taking special
medication; his cell contains a concrete bed with a mattress and blankets; he
receives three balanced meals a day, does handicraft work and makes
shampoo, cream, talcum powder and lotions; in addition, he practices the
Catholic religion and receives visits on Sundays; his cell has ventilation and
natural and artificial light.”
6.
The brief submitted by the representatives of the beneficiaries of the provisional
measures (hereinafter “the representatives”) on November 24, 2006, notifying that
they filed appeals for review in the criminal proceedings against Mr. Rodríguez-Lara
and Mr. Ruiz-Almengor; however, the Corte Suprema de Justicia (Guatemalan
Supreme Court of Justice) “[has] not ruled on [these] appeal[s…] and [maintain[s] the
death sentence imposed on both beneficiaries.” According to the representatives,
maintaining the death sentence “constitutes [per se] a cruel, inhuman or degrading
treatment, […] prolongs the psychological stress of the convicts, thereby violating
Article 5 of the American Convention.”
In addition, the representatives stated that in Guatemala “there is still no […]
legislation in force governing applications for executive clemency or pardon,” which
means that Messrs. Rodríguez-Lara and Ruiz-Almengor may not avail themselves of
such remedy.
As regards the prison conditions under which the beneficiaries are being held, their
representatives indicated that “the current prison regime to which they are subject is
extremely severe, imposing serious restrictions on their fundamental rights.” In
particular:
a)
Mr. Ruiz-Almengor “is held in a one by three meter cell,” which does not
have a bed or sanitary facilities and he only has access to the sanitary
facilities located outside his cell during daytime; “he has not had access
to work or education either.” The space provided for recreation and
leisure is “non-existent;” he is not allowed to go out in the sun “at any
time [, and is under] a 24-hour continuous confinement regime;”
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents