Dissenting Judge Eduardo Vio Grossi. Unanimously, that: 6. The State is responsible for the violation of the right to personal integrity, recognized in Article 5(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to Article 1(1) of this instrument, to the detriment of Manuela’s mother, father, elder and younger son, pursuant to paragraphs 262 to 266 of this judgment. AND ESTABLISHES: Unanimously, that: 7. This judgment constitutes, per se, a form of reparation. Unanimously, that: 8. The State shall make the publications indicated in paragraph 273 of this judgment. Unanimously, that: 9. The State shall hold a public act to acknowledge international responsibility, pursuant to paragraphs 276 and 277 of this judgment. Unanimously, that: 10. The State shall grant scholarships to the Manuela’s elder and younger son, pursuant to paragraph 279 of this judgment. Unanimously, that: 11. The State shall provide, free of charge and immediately, in a prompt, adequate and effective manner, medical, psychological and/or psychiatric treatment to Manuela’s parents, pursuant to paragraph 282 of this judgment. By six votes to one that: 12. The State shall regulate the obligation of medical professional secrecy and the confidentiality of medical records, pursuant to paragraph 287 of this judgment. Dissenting Judge Eduardo Vio Grossi. Unanimously, that: 13. The State shall elaborate an action protocol for the treatment of women who require emergency medical attention for obstetric emergencies, pursuant to paragraph 288 of this judgment. Unanimously, that: 14. The State shall adapt its regulations on pretrial detention, pursuant to paragraph 290 of this judgment. By six votes to one that: 15. The State shall design and implement an awareness-raising and training course for judicial officials, as well as the health personnel of the Rosales National Hospital, as established in paragraphs 294 and 295 of this judgment. Dissenting Judge Eduardo Vio Grossi. Unanimously, that: 16. The State shall adapt its regulation concerning the dosimetry of the sentence for infanticide, pursuant to paragraph 296 of this judgment. 88