6 (Operative Paragraph 2 of the Order of January 26, 2009; supra Having Seen 2), the State referred to a meeting held on December 16, 2008 between State representatives and members of the FAFG which mainly dealt with the matter of “coordinating actions for training security forces.” In its March 26, 2010 brief, the State also declared that it was “meeting with the beneficiaries in order to coordinate with them regarding the protective measures that will be provided to them [during the transfers to the exhumation site and during these exhumations] and to obtain a schedule for the transfers and exhumations that they are currently pending.” 18. The representatives indicated that “a dialogue was held” with State representatives in which they made proposals, requests, and certain coordination actions, but that this dialogue has been characterized by incomplete information for which “the results have been poor and uncertainty reigns” regarding the threats. In this regard, they highlighted that the last working meeting took place in November 2009. The representatives also noted that they “have met with two agents on different dates who informed them that they are undertaking [a] ‘risk assessment study,’” but that neither the FAFG nor the representatives have been informed or provided with the results of this study. 19. The Commission moved the Court to require that the State adopt all mechanisms necessary to guarantee the participation of the beneficiaries and the representatives in the structuring and execution of these provisional measures. * * * 20. In its April 22, 2010 brief, the Inter-American Commission sent the Court a recent public communication issued by the FAFG which gives detailed information on new threats that occurred on April 13, 2010. According to this communication, on that morning a driver parked his truck next to Mr. Omar Bertoni Girón, Chief of the FAFG Forensic Laboratory, while Mr. Girón was at a gas station buying coffee. A person proceeded to break into his car, shattering the glass and stealing a briefcase containing his laptop computer. The incident was allegedly captured by the filling station’s security cameras. The communication also indicated that on the evening of that same day Mr. Fredy Peccerelli received a threatening letter which made reference to what had happened to Mr. Girón. The text of these threats was published in the communication. In this regard, in the representatives’ brief of May 20, 2010, they commented that they are aware of no advances in the investigation into the theft of Mr. Girón’s computer “despite the existence of surveillance footage at the moment of the robbery” and moved the Court to require that the State undertake this investigation. In addition, representatives highlighted that the security measures provided “do not comply with either Mr. Fredy Peccerelli’s or Mr. Omar Girón’s needs at the present time” and regarded it as important “to strike a balance between the personnel assigned to the protection of [FAFG] members and their families, and the institution’s two headquarters.” 21. The Commission expressed “alarm” over the theft of Mr. Omar Bertoni Girón’s computer and the threat against the FAFG Executive Director, emphasizing that its concern “does not only refer to the incident against Mr. Girón, and the information obtained from his computer, but rather extends the threat to the Executive Director, his entire family, and the FAFG members.” In the Commission’s opinion, “the threat shows that the actions required of the Guatemalan State have not been effectively implemented.” * * *