5 again on June 10, 2010, in the framework of the anniversary of the death of Mr. Ramón Mauricio García Prieto, since the publication made in the newspaper “El Mundo” on May 13, 2008 “was not acknowledged by the García Prieto [f]amily or its representatives […], and therefore, it did not fulfill its reparative duty or that of a guarantee of non-repetition.” 12. In their observations the representatives informed that the State published on June 10, 2010, date of the anniversary of the murder of Ramón Mauricio García Prieto, a supplement in the “Prensa Gráfica” that “included the State’s position regarding this case, the relevant parts of the [J]udgment and information on its state of compliance,” which “was received with satisfaction by the victims.” Therefore, they requested that the Court consider this obligation complied with. 13. The Commission valued that informed by the parties positively and considered this matter complied with. 14. According to that informed with regard to the publication of the relevant parts of the Judgment in a newspaper of widespread circulation in El Salvador, the Tribunal considers that the State has complied with this aspect of the sixth operative paragraph of the Judgment and values the State’s willingness to comply with its commitment to publish the Judgment again and correct the deficiencies of the previous publication. At the same time, this Court points out that in said publication, besides that ordered in the Judgment, it included a summary regarding the monitoring of compliance with the Judgment, titled “Current State of the Compliance with the Judgment” and a photograph. 15. This Tribunal values positively the comprehensive compliance with the sixth operative paragraph of the Judgment on preliminary objections, merits, reparations, and costs issued by the Court on November 20, 2007, in what refers to the relevant parts of the Judgment in a newspaper of ample circulation, which constitutes progress by the State in the execution and implementation of the Court’s judgments. * * * 16. With regard to the seventh operative paragraph of the Judgment, which indicates the State’s obligation to offer the medical, psychiatric, or psychological assistance required by Mr. José Mauricio García Prieto Hirlemann and Mrs. Gloria Giralt de García Prieto (supra Having Seen paragraph 1), the State indicated that on April 8, 2010, it held a meeting in which the Minister of Public Health and Social Assistance, the Minister of Justice and Public Security, and the Sub-Director of the National Civil Police participated and discussed, among others, the present case, and the Minister of Public Health and Social Assistance presented a “Proposal of Procedures to Comply with the Judgments issued by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights,” which it enclosed. Likewise, the State mentioned that on January 10, 2010, held a meeting with the representatives and Mrs. Gloria de García Prieto, who stated that both Mr. Mauricio García Prieto and Mrs. Gloria de García Prieto “suffer complex diseases and that already have different diagnosis from specialists and specific medications, reason for which they consider it unnecessary to be submitted to new medical exams and/or to change medications.” Thus, the State has promoted the holding of a meeting on June 3, 2010, with those people in order to reach an agreement on how to offer the medical and psychological service as soon as possible.