4 b) beneficiaries "have not responded to the [State's] call to contact relevant authorities", which precludes "proper fulfillment" of the Court's orders by the Dominican Republic. It requested the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights (hereinafter "the Inter-American Commission" or "the Commission") to extend its good offices and call upon the representatives of the beneficiaries of the provisional measures2 (hereinafter "the representatives") to collaborate with the State by furnishing information to locate the beneficiaries of the provisional measures, "making them appear before the [Dominican] authorities"; c) the State and "the [Red de Encuentro Dominico-Haitiano (DominicanHaitian Meeting Network)] Jacques Viou, representative of the [beneficiaries], signed a collaboration agreement [on January 23, 2001] to enable the [State] to ascertain the true situation of the [beneficiaries] and comply with the mandate of the [...] Court”; d) on March 19, 2002, at the seat of the State Secretariat of Foreign Relations, in the presence of members of the Inter-American Commission and representatives of the beneficiaries, a Memorandum of Understanding was drawn up with a view to creating a coordination and supervision mechanism of provisional measures. On July 2, 2002, the State informed that the Comité de Impulso (Committee for the Implementation of Provisional Measures), created under the aforementioned Memorandum of Understanding, was the subject of a constitutional motion filed by a group of lawyers and representatives of the civil society before the Supreme Court of Justice of the Dominican Republic; e) “it notifi[ed] competent authorities that Messrs. Benito Tide-Méndez, Rafael[ito] Pérez-Charles, Antonio Sension, Andrea Alezy, Janty Fils-Aime, William Medina-Ferreras and Berson Gelim, are under special protection", in compliance with the orders of the Court; f) on March 18, 2002, it supplied safe-conducts to Messrs. Antonio Sesion and Benito Tide-Méndez, and on March 19, 2002, to Mr. William Medina-Ferrera and his family, Mr. Janty Fils-Aime and his family, and Mr. Berson Gelim and his family; g) on August 12, 2002, it supplied safe-conducts to Mss. Ana Virgil, Reyita Antonia and Ana Lidia Sension, Mr. Antonio Sesion's next of kin, and to other six people, who are not beneficiaries of these measures; h) the safe-conducts were granted so that beneficiaries could clarify and regularize their migratory situation, and the time elapsed between the date when the documents were granted "and [December 16, 2003] is enough for them to have regularized their migratory status". In this respect, it is It is worth mentioning that in the initial processing of these provisional measures, pursuant to the Rules of Procedure of the Court in force as of November 24, 2000, only the State and the Commission intervened. Those Rules were reformed by Order of the Court of November 25, 2003, and Article 25(6) thereof provided that beneficiaries of provisional measures "may address their comments on the report made by the State directly to the Court". Hence, the representatives submitted their first comments on the report made by the State on April 20, 2004. From that date onwards, the representatives have continued to submit the corresponding comments. 2