32. Mr. Rodríguez gave a statement to the inquiry and said that Mrs. V.P.C. belonged to a “sinister, satanic, and sectarian organization called Mormon (…) who were the ones behind all these accusations.”19 33. On November 22, 2001, the presiding judge scheduled a medical examination for V.R.P. 20 In a communication submitted to the Director of the Jinoteca Department Local Comprehensive Healthcare System (SILAIS), Mrs. V.P.C. indicated that forensic physician Andrés Altamirano had “behaved in an unethical, grotesque and vulgar manner” while examining her daughter.21 34. She alleges that Dr. Altamirano said that V.R.P. “had to submit to his vulgar treatment and that he could not provide her with sedatives.”22 She maintains that the physician said “do not cry anymore, when girls from the countryside come to me (…) I tell them to open their legs and they do it, they do not get scandalized like you.”23 She argues that the physician stated that ““if you will not let me examine you vaginally, I wonder what you will do when I have to examine your anus.”24 Mrs. V.P.C. indicated that as a result, her daughter began to scream and cry and refused to be examined. 25 Consequently, the medical examination was not performed. For its part, doctor Altamirano submitted a stated to the Court indicating that V.R.P. “did not cooperate, despite persuasion exerted by (...) the mother of the child”.26 35. Mrs. V.P.C. states that another medical examination was scheduled for November 24, 2001, at the Women’s Center with a different medical examiner. 27 She maintains that the girl “stated that (…) she did not want anyone to touch her (…) due to the treatment she was subjected to the first time.”28 Therefore, the medical examination was not performed. 36. On November 26, 2001, an external psychiatric evaluation was conducted at the Victoria Motta Hospital in Jinoteca.29 The report concludes that V.R.P. “clearly identified the person responsible as her father and specified that her father also has the same disease the she is currently suffering from.”30 The report adds that “her account is trustworthy, very clear and authentic.”31 37. On the same day, Mrs. V.P.C. submitted a communication to the District Criminal Judge in Jinoteca stating that the two medical examinations that had been attempted were not performed, as V.R.P. had refused because she was afraid and psychologically traumatized.32 19 Annex 2. Statement given to the inquiry by Heberto Rodríguez, p. 46, criminal case file. 20 Annex 9. Brief from Mrs. V.P.C. of November 22, 2001. Annex A to the communication received on March 16, 2005. 21 Annex 9. Brief from Mrs. V.P.C. of November 22, 2001. Annex A to the communication received on March 16, 2005. 22 Annex 9. Brief from Mrs. V.P.C. of November 22, 2001. Annex A to the communication received on March 16, 2005. 23 Annex 10. Communication from the petitioner received on March 16, 2005. 24 Annex 10. Communication from the petitioner received on March 16, 2005. 25 Annex 11. Brief from Mrs. V.P.C. of November 23, 2001. Annexed to the communication from the State from July 25, 2014. 26 Annex 2. Communication of November 23, 2011, page 66, criminal case file. 27 Annex 12. Communication from the petitioner of February 22, 2006. 28 Annex 13. Communication from the petitioner received on April 7, 2003. Annex 5. External psychiatrist’s report of November 26, 2001. Annex F to the communication from the petitioner received on February 22, 2006. 29 30 Annex 5. External psychiatrist’s report of November 26, 2001. Annex F to the communication from the petitioner received on February 22, 2006. 31 Annex 5. External psychiatrist’s report of November 26, 2001. Annex F to the communication from the petitioner received on February 22, 2006. 32 Annex 14. Brief filed by V.P.C. with the Jinoteca District Criminal Judge of November 26, 2001. Annexed to the communication from the State of July 25, 2014.