57 has eight siblings,130 Pedro, Pompeya, Filomena, Julio, Santa, Obdulia, Marcelina, and Adela, all of them Ramírez-Rojas. Urcesino Ramírez-Rojas has a child, Marco Antonio Ramírez-Álvarez.131 97(132) At the time of his arrest, Urcesino Ramírez-Rojas lived with his sister, Filomena Ramírez-Rojas; his mother, María Alejandra Rojas; and his nephew, Edwin Álvarez-Ramírez.132 97(133) The relatives who would visit the alleged victim at the penitentiary were subjected to humiliating treatment, for the mere fact of being relatives of a person charged with the crime of terrorism.133 97(134) The physical, psychological, and emotional condition of Urcesino RamírezRojas’ son and siblings was impaired as a result of having a next of kin arrested, accused, and prosecuted for the crime of terrorism. At the time he was arrested, Urcesino Ramírez-Rojas provided economic and moral support to his family.134 97(135) Filomena Ramírez-Rojas, a sister of Urcesino Ramírez-Rojas, would undergo a personal search which violated her privacy when entering the penitentiary to visit her brother, and was stigmatized for having a brother accused of committing acts of terrorism. As a result of these events and the arrest of her brother, the physical and psychological health of Filomena Ramírez-Rojas deteriorated, and she suffered from nervous problems and insomnia. Filomena Ramírez-Rojas was entrusted with the care and support of Urcesino Ramírez-Rojas’ son.135 97(136) Marcelina Ramírez-Rojas, also a sister of Urcesino Ramírez-Rojas, was arrested when she went to the penitentiary to take her brother, Urcesino RamírezRojas, a green coat, under the allegation that they were planning his escape, which made his next of kin fearful of visiting him.136 130 Cf. Identity documents of Pedro, Pompeya, Filomena, Julio, Santa, Obdulia, Marcelina, and Adela, all of them Ramírez-Rojas (case file of evidence to facilitate the adjudication of the case submitted by the representatives on November 11, 2005, pages 6519 to 6526); testimony of April 8, 2005 rendered by Urcesino Ramírez-Rojas before a notary public (affidavit) (case file of affidavits and comments, page 5979); and testimony of September 21, 2004 rendered by Pedro Ramírez-Rojas (case file of appendixes to the brief of requests and arguments, volume 1II, appendix 61, page 2167). 131 Cf. Testimony of September 12, 2004, rendered by Marcos Ramírez-Álvarez (case file of appendixes to the brief of requests and arguments, volume 3, appendix 60, page 2164). 132 Cf. Statement of August 2, 1991, rendered by Urcesino Ramírez-Rojas before the DINCOTE (case file of evidence to facilitate the adjudication of the case submitted by the State, volume V, page 4557); and testimony of September 12, 2004, rendered by Filomena Ramírez-Rojas (case file of appendixes to the brief of requests and arguments, volume 2, appendix 35, page 1953). 133 Cf. Testimony of September 12, 2004, rendered by Filomena Ramírez-Rojas (case file of appendixes to the brief of requests and arguments, volume II, appendix 35, pages 1953 to 1954); and statement rendered before a notary public (affidavit) by Celia Asto-Urbano on April 5, 2005 (case file of affidavits and comments, page 5951). 134 Cf. Testimony of June 19, 2004, rendered by Urcesino Ramírez-Rojas (case file of appendixes to the brief of requests and arguments, volume I, appendix 16, page 1837); and testimony rendered without specified date by Julio Ramírez-Rojas (case file of appendixes to the brief of requests and arguments, volume III, appendix 59, page 2160). 135 Cf. Testimony of September 12, 2004, rendered by Filomena Ramírez-Rojas (case file of appendixes to the brief of requests and arguments, volume II, appendix 35, page 1953). 136 Cf. Testimony of September 12, 2004, rendered by Filomena Ramírez-Rojas (case file of appendixes to the brief of requests and arguments, volume II, appendix 35, pages 1953 to 1954).