3 public policies favorable to the expansion and protection of human rights. This ambit of reception may be attended, however, even in the absence of explicit constitutional dispositions –as has occurred in several cases-, with sustenance of internal norms in favor of fundamental rights and liberties and in the “anthropocentric spirit” which animates the radical decisions of modern political societies. F) Jurisdictional reception 10. Internal jurisdictional reception of international jurisprudential criteria is indispensable, which at the same time should undertake the reflection and contribution which come from internal justice systems. The harmonization of the continental order of human rights should be the product of persistent and profound dialogue: jurisprudential dialogue, which advances. This realm of reception constitutes –as I have had occasion to affirm in other fora, in particular before the political organs of the Organization of American States- one of the most encouraging at the present time in the Inter-American System. G) Legal Reception (instrumental) 11. Likewise, reception is absolutely necessary through the internal norms of fulfillment (which may be denominated instrumental legal means), which constitute the bridge such that international orders are naturally and quickly transmitted without errors and applied domestically, which requires immediate and adequately facilitated executive steps. I do not say that this normative structure is a condition for the validity of international provisions; I only recall that it is a natural medium for their effectiveness. 12. This angle of reception has been left behind. In general, national formulas are not ordered -although there may be good will in practice, which powerfully contributes to the fulfillment, through appropriate interpretations- which foresee with detail the internal admission of the international recommendations and resolutions. Indemnifying reparations exist in some legal systems, but these do not occur in the same way as other types of reparations, whose complexity requires clear rules that deliver quick decisions. These other types constitute, for sure, some of the most important reparations, which are characteristic and evolutionary of the InterAmerican jurisdiction over human rights and the guarantee of adequate reparations which the system contains. H) Regulatory initiatives 13. There are commendable initiatives which have arisen in some States and which may be supported, complemented, or enriched by professional and academic contribution, in the sense of elaborating first drafts of secondary legal systems, preferably rooted in the constitution, designed to guide the fulfillment of international recommendations and orders on the subject of human rights. Of course, each State should have norms that recognize and develop its own circumstances, but it would be practical to have an instrument which collects the general patterns in the introduction of international decisions in national legislation, broad rules of reparations, and special orientations in relation to the variety of categories of reparation that Inter-American jurisprudence has produced