Articles 1(1) and 5(1) thereof, to the detriment of those who were displaced owing to the facts of the case, as established in paragraphs 255 to 268 hereof. 6. The alleged violation of the right recognized in Article 11 of the American Convention on Human Rights has not been proved, for the reasons given in paragraphs 286 to 289 of this Judgment. 7. The alleged violation of the rights recognized in Articles 8 and 25 of the American Convention on Human Rights has not been proved, for the reasons indicated in paragraphs 154 to 173 of this Judgment; nevertheless, in light of the general obligation contained in Article 1(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, the State must continue the investigations and the administrative and judicial proceedings that are underway and, as appropriate, continue any others that are required in order to make a complete determination of the facts of this case and the corresponding responsibilities, as established in paragraph 297 of this Judgment. 8. It is not appropriate to analyze the facts of this case in light of Article 2 of the Convention, for the reasons indicated in paragraphs 245 and 246 of this Judgment. AND ESTABLISHES, unanimously, that: 1. This Judgment constitutes per se a form of reparation 2. The State must organize a public act to acknowledge international responsibility for the facts of this case, as established in paragraphs 301 and 302 of this Judgment. 3. The State must make the publications ordered as established in paragraph 303 of this Judgment. 4. The State must provide comprehensive health care treatment to the victims through its specialized health institutions, as established in paragraph 309 of this Judgment. 5. The State must grant and execute, within one year, using an expedite internal mechanism, the pertinent compensation and indemnities for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, in favor of the injured victims and the next of kin of victims who have not received reparation under the domestic contentious-administrative jurisdiction, in the terms of paragraphs 337 and 345 to 349 of this Judgment. 6. The State must pay the amounts established in paragraph 344 of this Judgment, as reimbursement of costs and expenses. 7. The Court will monitor full compliance with the Judgment, in exercise of its attributes and in compliance with its obligations under the American Convention, and will conclude this case when the State has complied fully with all its provisions. 8. Within one year of its notification, the State must provide the Court with a report on the measures taken to comply with this Judgment Done, at San José, Costa Rica, on November 30, 2012, in the Spanish and English languages, the Spanish text being authentic. Diego García-Sayán President ‐ 98 ‐