75
134.67.
on October 4, 2001, the Constitutional Court designated the Second
Chamber of the Court of Appeals to “process, hear, and decide –in its current statethe amparo remedy” filed by Juan Guillermo Oliva Carrera against the July 13, 2001
ruling of the Third Criminal, Drug Trafficking and Environmental Crimes Trial
Court;161
134.68.
on October 29, 2001, the Second Chamber of the Court of Appeals, acting
as an Amparo Court, decided to annul the provisional amparo ordered on September
21, 2001, as it deemed that the circumstances that made it be in order had
changed.162 On November 25, 2001, defendant Oliva Carrera filed an appeal before
the Second Chamber of the Court of Appeals against its October 29, 2001 ruling;163
134.69.
on February 25, 2002, the Second Chamber of the Court of Appeals,
acting as an Amparo Court, found the amparo remedy filed by defendant Oliva
Carrera against the July 5, 2001 ruling (supra para. 134.64) of the Third Criminal,
Drug Trafficking and Environmental Crimes Trial Court inadmissible. It also ordered
the defendant to pay the legal costs and fined his attorney five hundred quetzales.164
On March 27, 2002, defendant Oliva Carrera filed an appeal against said ruling of
February 25, 2002, before the Second Chamber of the Court of Appeals, acting as an
Amparo Court;165
134.70.
on June 30, 2002, while his appeal was pending, defendant Oliva Carrera
asked the Constitutional Court to order a temporary stay of the June 11, 2002 ruling
of the Third Criminal, Drug Trafficking and Environmental Crimes Trial Court, in
which it set a new hearing for the oral debate to commence; 166
134.71.
on September 11, 2002, defendant Oliva Carrera asked the Constitutional
Court to discontinue the appeal that he had filed against the February 25, 2002
ruling of the Second Chamber of the Court of Appeals, acting as an Amparo Court.167
161
Cf. Order of the Constitutional Court of October 4, 2001 (file with annexes to the brief filed by
the representatives of the victim with observations on the preliminary objections, leaves 95 to 97).
162
Cf. Order of the Second Chamber of the Court of Appeals of October 29, 2001 (file with evidence
to facilitate adjudication of the case submitted by the representatives of the victim on September 5,
2003, leaf 10559).
163
Cf. appeal before the Second Chamber of the Court of Appeals of November 25, 2001 (file with
evidence to facilitate adjudication of the case submitted by the representatives of the victim on
September 5, 2003, leaves 10572 to 10573).
164
Cf. Order of the Second Chamber of the Court of Appeals of February 25, 2002 (file with
evidence to facilitate adjudication of the case submitted by the representatives of the victim on
September 5, 2003, leaves 10439 to 10444).
165
Cf. appeal before the Second Chamber of the Court of Appeals on March 27, 2002 (file with
evidence to facilitate adjudication of the case submitted by the representatives of the victim on
September 5, 2003, leaves 10463 to 10465).
166
Cf. request to the Constitutional Court on June 30, 2002 (file with evidence to facilitate
adjudication of the case submitted by the representatives of the victim on September 5, 2003, leaves
10493 to 10495).
167
Cf. request to the Constitutional Court of September 11, 2002 (file with evidence to facilitate
adjudication of the case submitted by the representatives of the victim on September 5, 2003, leaves
10500 to 10501).
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents