75 134.67. on October 4, 2001, the Constitutional Court designated the Second Chamber of the Court of Appeals to “process, hear, and decide –in its current statethe amparo remedy” filed by Juan Guillermo Oliva Carrera against the July 13, 2001 ruling of the Third Criminal, Drug Trafficking and Environmental Crimes Trial Court;161 134.68. on October 29, 2001, the Second Chamber of the Court of Appeals, acting as an Amparo Court, decided to annul the provisional amparo ordered on September 21, 2001, as it deemed that the circumstances that made it be in order had changed.162 On November 25, 2001, defendant Oliva Carrera filed an appeal before the Second Chamber of the Court of Appeals against its October 29, 2001 ruling;163 134.69. on February 25, 2002, the Second Chamber of the Court of Appeals, acting as an Amparo Court, found the amparo remedy filed by defendant Oliva Carrera against the July 5, 2001 ruling (supra para. 134.64) of the Third Criminal, Drug Trafficking and Environmental Crimes Trial Court inadmissible. It also ordered the defendant to pay the legal costs and fined his attorney five hundred quetzales.164 On March 27, 2002, defendant Oliva Carrera filed an appeal against said ruling of February 25, 2002, before the Second Chamber of the Court of Appeals, acting as an Amparo Court;165 134.70. on June 30, 2002, while his appeal was pending, defendant Oliva Carrera asked the Constitutional Court to order a temporary stay of the June 11, 2002 ruling of the Third Criminal, Drug Trafficking and Environmental Crimes Trial Court, in which it set a new hearing for the oral debate to commence; 166 134.71. on September 11, 2002, defendant Oliva Carrera asked the Constitutional Court to discontinue the appeal that he had filed against the February 25, 2002 ruling of the Second Chamber of the Court of Appeals, acting as an Amparo Court.167 161 Cf. Order of the Constitutional Court of October 4, 2001 (file with annexes to the brief filed by the representatives of the victim with observations on the preliminary objections, leaves 95 to 97). 162 Cf. Order of the Second Chamber of the Court of Appeals of October 29, 2001 (file with evidence to facilitate adjudication of the case submitted by the representatives of the victim on September 5, 2003, leaf 10559). 163 Cf. appeal before the Second Chamber of the Court of Appeals of November 25, 2001 (file with evidence to facilitate adjudication of the case submitted by the representatives of the victim on September 5, 2003, leaves 10572 to 10573). 164 Cf. Order of the Second Chamber of the Court of Appeals of February 25, 2002 (file with evidence to facilitate adjudication of the case submitted by the representatives of the victim on September 5, 2003, leaves 10439 to 10444). 165 Cf. appeal before the Second Chamber of the Court of Appeals on March 27, 2002 (file with evidence to facilitate adjudication of the case submitted by the representatives of the victim on September 5, 2003, leaves 10463 to 10465). 166 Cf. request to the Constitutional Court on June 30, 2002 (file with evidence to facilitate adjudication of the case submitted by the representatives of the victim on September 5, 2003, leaves 10493 to 10495). 167 Cf. request to the Constitutional Court of September 11, 2002 (file with evidence to facilitate adjudication of the case submitted by the representatives of the victim on September 5, 2003, leaves 10500 to 10501).

Select target paragraph3

Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents