point out that this process will not be supervised by this international Court, which will only oversee the creation of a mechanism for reopening judicial proceedings, in the terms of paragraph 180 of the judgment. V OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS 23. Therefore, THE COURT, pursuant to Article 67 of the American Convention on Human Rights and Articles 31(3) and 68 of the Court’s Rules of Procedure, DECIDES: Unanimously: 1. To declare admissible the request for interpretation of the judgment on preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs issued in the case of Sales Pimenta v. Brazil, presented by the representatives, pursuant to the terms of paragraph 7 of this judgment of interpretation. 2. To clarify, by means of an interpretation, the judgment on preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs issued in the case of Sales Pimenta v. Brazil, with regard to the location where the public memorial should be built and to rectify the material error in paragraph 162 and in the twelfth operative paragraph of the judgment, pursuant to paragraphs 14 to 15 of this judgment of interpretation. 3. To declare inadmissible the request for interpretation of the judgment on preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs issued in the case of Sales Pimenta v. Brazil, presented by the representatives regarding the seventeenth operative paragraph, pursuant to paragraphs 18 to 21 of this judgment of interpretation. 4. To order the Secretariat of the Court to notify this judgment of interpretation to the Federative Republic of Brazil, the representatives of the victims and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. 6