14 balance of outstanding default interest and in spite of the delays, the State has evidenced a will to compensate him and has covered almost the entirety of the amounts owed on these grounds, so he is “willing to consider the Judgment to be complied with as to this aspect”. Therefore, they requested the Court to "declare that the State has complied with [this] obligation". 32. That the Inter-American Commission took notice of the briefs of the State. 33. That, in accordance with the parties' briefs and the victim’s intention, the Court deems it appropriate to consider the State to have complied with the obligation to pay default interest owed to Mr. Herrera-Ulloa pursuant to operative paragraphs No. 6, 7 and 9 of the Judgment. Therefore: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, In exercise of its powers to supervise compliance with its decisions under Articles 33, 62(1), 62(3), 65, 67 and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, Articles 25(1) and 30 of the Statute and Article 30 and 63 of its Rules of Procedure,7 DECLARES, 1. That, pursuant to Considering clause No. 33 hereof, the State has implemented the following reparation measure: (a) Payment of interest incurred as a result of having paid Mr. Mauricio Herrera-Ulloa compensation for non-pecuniary damage and reimbursed him for expenses incurred after expiry of the term set out in the Judgment (operative paragraphs No. 6, 7 and 9 of the Judgment). 2. That, pursuant to Considering clauses No. 17, 18, 28 and 29 hereof, the Court shall keep open the compliance with judgment proceedings for the following items: Rules adopted by the Court in its XLIX Ordinary Session held from November 16 to 25, 2000, as partially amended during the LXXXII Ordinary Session, held from January 19 to 31, 2009, pursuant to Articles 71 and 72 thereof. 7