-18ii) El Salvador has not provided all the information needed to assess whether the Inter-institutional Commission satisfies all the parameters for its operation established by the Court in the judgment. Both the representatives and the Inter-American Commission have stated that this Inter-institutional Commission does not satisfy these parameters. Therefore, the Court considers that the State must provide detailed information on compliance with the parameters established in paragraphs 185 to 188 of the judgment; iii) Regarding the case of the Serrano Cruz sisters, based on the observations of the Commission and the representatives, the Court has verified that the State’s report does not refer to any specific measure adopted by the Tracing Commission in order to discover their whereabouts. The State has advised that “regarding the work of this Commission, at the beginning of March, it resolved the first case of a person who was found”; iv) Even though the State indicated that the Inter-Institutional Tracing Commission had been able to access the files and information it had requested from State organs and authorities (supra Having seen paragraph 4.v), it should be recalled that the State must adopt the necessary measures to “ensure that all the State institutions and authorities are obliged to cooperate by providing information to the national Tracing Commission as well as access to all files and records that could contain information on the possible whereabouts of the young people in question.” To be able to assess compliance with this reparation, the Court considers that El Salvador must advise which measure it has adopted ensures that this information will be provided; v) Regarding the State’s obligation to assign “the necessary human, financial, logistic, scientific and other resources [for the Tracing Commission] to be able to investigate and discover the whereabouts of young people who disappeared during the armed conflict when they were children,” El Salvador indicated that it had begun to take measures to this end (supra Having seen paragraph 4). The Court finds that the State must report on the result of these measures, and also on the measures adopted to “guarantee the independence and impartiality of the members of the national Tracing Commission,” an aspect to which it makes no reference in its report; and vi) An essential aspect of the functioning of the Tracing Commission is that it should include State institutions that have shown interest in resolving this problem and others based on their functions, and also that civil society should participate in the Commission through non-governmental organizations dedicated to this search or specialized in working with young disappeared persons, such as the Asociación Pro-Búsqueda. Consequently, the Court finds that the State must report on the measures adopted to comply with this aspect; (c) Creation of a genetic information system that allows genetic data that can contribute to determining and clarifying the identification and the relationship of the disappeared children and their next of kin to be obtained and conserved (seventh operative paragraph of the judgment of March 1, 2005).