49 abduction) and forced disappearance of persons, and eight individuals56 as aiders and abettors of said crimes.57 80(76) On January 24, 2003, the First Special Criminal Courtroom of the Superior Court of Justice in Lima ordered the commencement of preliminary investigation as ordinary proceedings documented in file No. 03-2003, against several Army members and former military men58 on the grounds of their alleged involvement in crimes against the life, body and health (in the degree of aggravated murder), crime against personal freedom (in the degree of aggravated abduction), and forced disappearance of persons, against professor Hugo Muñoz-Sánchez and nine students of the La Cantuta University, arrest warrants being issued against the accused. Furthermore, said Court also filed a complaint against other eight persons59 on the grounds of their involvement as aiders and abettors in the same crimes, against whom qualified summons to appear and home detention warrants were issued. Moreover, the Court ordered that “precautionary attachment be levied” on property for an amount between one and three million New Soles on the unencumbered property of the accused. The arrest warrants were appealed by some of the accused, and later confirmed by the Court.60 No-one of said army members or former military men was investigated in the military proceedings nor convicted in case No. 157-V-93, that was prosecuted before military courts (above paras. 80(54) and 80(55)), except Anilino PortellaNúñez, who was treated in said proceedings as a party on default and in respect of whom, by operation of the amnesty law, the SCMJ ordered the “discontinuance of proceedings” (“corte de secuela”). Later on, the same SCMJ entered a declaration of nullity against said ruling (above paras. 80(54) and 80(60)-80(63)).61 80(77) This investigation was declared a complex matter in June 2003. Pursuant to the “complex and mixed connection of this case”62 with those pending in other courts against the alleged perpetrators of other crimes, the Ad Hoc Prosecutor’s Office requested 56 Namely, Julio Rolando Salazar-Monroe, Víctor Raúl Silva-Mendoza, Carlos Indacochea-Ballon, Alberto Segundo Pinto-Cárdenas, Luis Cubas-Portal, Enrique Oswaldo-Oliveros, Julio Alberto Rodríguez-Córdova, and Carlos Miranda-Balarezo. 57 Cf. Materialization of criminal complaint filed by the Provincial Specialized Prosecutor’s Office (record of Appendixes to application, Appendix 38(k), pp 1398-412). 58 Namely, Aquilino Portella-Núñez, Héctor Gamarra-Mamani, José William Tena-Jacinto, Pablo Andrés Atuncar-Cama, Gabriel Orlando Vera-Navarrete, Jorge Enrique Ortiz-Mantas, Fernando Lecca-Esquen, Hércules Gómez-Casanova, Wilmer Yarleque-Ordinola, Ángel Sauñi-Pomaya, Rolando Javier Meneses-de-Oca, Haydee Magda Terrazas-Arroyo, Luz Iris Cumpitaz-Mendoza, José Alarcón-González, Hugo Francisco Coral-Goycochea, Carlos Luis Caballero-Zegarra-Ballón, Isaac Paquillauri-Huaytalla, and Víctor Hinojosa-Sopla. 59 Namely, Julio Rolando Salazar-Moroe, Víctor Raúl Silva-Mendoza, Carlos Indacochea-Ballón, Alberto PintoCárdenas, Luis Cubas-Portal, Enrique Osvaldo Oliveros-Pérez, Carlos Miranda-Balarezo, and Julio RodríguezCórdova. 60 Cf. Decision of January 24, 2003, rendered by the First Special Criminal Anticorruption Court submitted as Appendix to State Note No. 7-5-M/393, of November 4, 2003 (record of Appendixes to application, Appendix 40.i, pp. 1467-91, and Appendixs 43(cc), p. 1737). 61 Cf. Official letter No. 03-2003-61-SPE-CSJL of the Special Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice in Lima (file with evidence to facilitate adjudication of the case, pp. 4170-2), and submission made by the State on November 20, 2006, in response to the request for evidence to facilitate adjudication of the case (files for the merits of the case, reparation and costs, if any, p. 1090). 62 Cf. Code of Criminal Procedure, Law No. 9024, Section 20 (file with evidence to facilitate adjudication of the case).