111 236. Moreover, with regard to the request to build a memorial, the Court thinks highly of the memorial and public site named "El ojo que llora" (The Crying Eye), built by a civil association in collaboration with state authorities as a main acknowledgement to the victims of violence in Perú. However, the Court considers that the State must ensure that, within the term of one year, the 10 individuals declared executed or forcefully disappeared victims in the instant case shall be represented in said memorial if they are not represented so far and provided their relatives so desire. In doing so, the State must coordinate the victims’ relatives’ efforts to place a sign with the name of each victim, in the manner that may best fit the characteristics of the memorial. d) Publication of the Judgment 237. As ordered in other cases and as a measure of satisfaction,185 the State shall publish at least once in the Official Gazette and in another national daily newspaper, the sections entitled Partial Acknowledgement, Proven Facts, without the corresponding footnotes, and paragraphs 81 to 98, 109 to 116, 122 to 129, 135 to 161 and 165 to 189, and the operative paragraphs of this Judgment. Said publication shall be made within six months following notice of this Judgment. e) Medical and psychological treatment for the next of kin of executed or forcefully disappeared victims 238. The Court considers that it is necessary to provide for a measure of reparation seeking to relieve the bodily and psychological suffering of the relatives of Hugo MuñozSánchez, Dora Oyague-Fierro, Marcelino Rosales-Cárdenas, Bertila Lozano-Torres, Luis Enrique Ortiz-Perea, Armando Richard Amaro-Cóndor, Robert Edgar Teodoro-Espinoza, Heráclides Pablo-Meza, Juan Gabriel Mariños-Figueroa and Felipe Flores-Chipana. To that end, the Court orders the State to provide the above-mentioned individuals, with their prior consent and for the necessary period of time from the date the notice of this Judgment is served upon them, free of charge and at national health-care facilities, with any necessary medical and psychological treatment which shall comprise provision of medicines. The psychological treatment must be provided taking into account the specific conditions and needs of each individual. g) Training in human rights 239. The acts attributable to the State in the instant case were perpetrated by members of the “Grupo Colina” forces in violation of the provisions of compulsory International Law. The Court has further argued that186 in order to adequately secure the right to life and humane treatment, the members of security forces must receive proper training and education. Furthermore, the events in the instant case occurred amidst a then existing generalized context of impunity of severe violations of human rights, which was fostered and encompassed by the lack of respect to the right to a fair trial and the inefficacy of judicial authorities to handle those situations, which in turn translated as the impunity of the major perpetrators of the violations. 185 Cf. Case of Goiburú et al. supra note 1, para. 175; Case of Montero-Aranguren et al. (Retén de Catia), supra note 97, para. 151; and Case of Ximenes-Lopes, supra note 6, para. 249. 186 Cf. Case of Montero-Aranguren et al. (Retén de Catia), supra note 97, para. 147.