measures requested by the Commission and the representatives. 152. Regarding the requested satisfaction measures, the Court establishes that the publication of the judgment and the official summary are appropriate measures, and therefore additional requests in this regard are not granted. D. Compensation 153. The Commission requested that the State "make full [r]eparation[s] for the human rights violations declared in the Merits Report [,] including both pecuniary and non-pecuniary aspects." D.1. Pecuniary damage 154. The representative argued that the State must pay the victim "all the remunerations and other benefits that, by law, [would] have corresponded to him from the date of his dismissal [from the position] until the date of reinstatement to [a]ctive [s]ervice." To this end, the respective calculation should be made "according to the length of service in each police rank that the [alleged] victim should have had according to his year of graduation." 155. They added that the documentation provided in the process makes it possible to establish "the salary that a police officer received from the year 2000 [...] until the present, taking into account each of the ranks that would correspond to the [alleged] victim up to the present time." In addition to the above, there are other items such as the thirteenth-month salary, fourteenth-month salary, reserve funds, "police day that was in force until 2010" and severance payment, "which is applicable to police officers who have completed 20 years of service." Based on the above, it was requested that the State be ordered to pay material damages of $471,891.00 (four hundred and seventy-one thousand eight hundred and ninetyone United States dollars), in compensation "for [twenty] years and three months of lost wages," to Mr. Mina Cuero. 156. The State argued that the victim did not provide any evidentiary elements in the proceedings to support the loss of income, or any detriment related to the facts of the case. The State pointed out that according to information from the internal tax administration, Mr. Mina Cuero engaged in economic activities from 2008 to 2017. It was pointed out that Mr. Mina Cuero intends that Ecuador cover items destined for bonuses, promotions, and compensations, among others, that "cannot be objectively evaluated [,] as it cannot [be] proven [...] that [...] he would have been promoted or would have been eligible for the alleged bonuses." 157. It also argued that, in the event that the Court considers any potential compensation on this account, it could never exceed, for calculation purposes, "the rank actually held by Mr. Mina Cuero, which is one of a National Police Officer." 158. This Court has established case law to the effect that pecuniary damages, which involve the loss of or detriment to the victim’s income, the expenses incurred as a result of the facts, and the monetary consequences that have a causal nexus with the facts of the case. 121 Similarly, case law has reiterated the compensatory nature of reparations, whose nature and amount depend on the damage caused, and therefore, are not supposed to enrich or Cf. Case of Bámaca Velásquez v. Guatemala. Reparations and Costs. Judgment of February 22, 2002. Series C No. 91, para. 43, and Case of Deras García et al. v. Honduras, supra, para. 123. 121