CEJIL

- Library
- Sign in

5) I understand that the principle ne bis in idem was not violated for the stated reasons. Ricardo Pérez Manrique Judge Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Registrar 7

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Uwazi is developed by
CEJIL
Library
Login

Info
20Relationships

Search Tips

Search text

Type something in the search box to get some results.

I INTRODUCTION OF THE CASE AND PURPOSE OF THE DISPUTE4
II PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT4
III JURISDICTION6
IV PRELIMINARY OBJECTION7
A. Arguments of the parties and the Commission7
B. Considerations of the Court7
V EVIDENCE 8
A. Admissibility of documentary evidence8
B. Admissibility of statements and expert evidence9
VI FACTS9
A. Relevant regulatory framework9
B. Disciplinary proceedings against Víctor Henrry Mina Cuero11
C. Appeal mechanisms promoted by Mr. Mina Cuero15
VIII MERITS18
VIII.1 RIGHT TO JUDICIAL GUARANTEES, IN RELATION TO THE OBLIGATIONS TO RESPECT AND ENSURE RIGHTS AND TO ADOPT DOMESTIC LEGAL PROVISIONS18
A. Arguments of the Commission and of the parties18
A.1. Right to prior and detailed notice of the accusation, to adequate time and facilities for the preparation of the defense and to be assisted by a defense attorney of his choice18
A.2. Principle of presumption of innocence regarding the use of criminal records in the sanction of dismissal.19
A.3. The principle of legality and the right to have sufficient reasoning.20
A.4. Right to appeal the judgment20
B. Considerations of the Court21
B.1. Right to prior and detailed communication of the charges, to sufficient time and appropriate means for the preparation of the defense, and to appeal the judgment21
B.2. Rights to a reasoned decision and the presumption of innocence24
B.3. General conclusion27
VIII.2 POLITICAL RIGHTS, IN RELATION TO THE OBLIGATIONS TO RESPECT AND ENSURERIGHTS27
VIII.3 RIGHT TO JUDICIAL PROTECTION, IN RELATION TO OBLIGATIONS TO RESPECTAND ENSURE RIGHTS28
A. Arguments of the Commission and of the parties28
B. Considerations of the Court28
VIII.4 RIGHT TO WORK, IN RELATION TO THE OBLIGATION TO RESPECT AND ENSURERIGHTS30
A. Arguments of the parties30
B. Considerations of the Court30
IX REPARATIONS34
A. Injured party34
B. Measures of restitution34
C. Measures of satisfaction35
D. Other measures requested36
D. Compensation37
E. Costs and Expenses39
I. Method of complying with the payments ordered39
X OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS40
VOTE OF JUDGE PÉREZ MANRIQUE43
VOTE OF JUDGE SIERRA PORTO50
VOTE OF JUDGE PEREZ GOLDBERG 54

Mina Cuero. Judgment. September 7, 2022

IACourt judgment

Preview

Type

Costs
Merits
Preliminary Objections
Reparations

Date: Sep 7, 2022

Mechanism

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

Number: C 464

Country

Ecuador

Signatories

Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot
Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
Nancy Hernández López
Patricia Pérez Goldberg
Ricardo C. Pérez Manrique
Rodrigo de Bittencourt Mudrovitsch
Verónica Gómez

Separate vote

Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
Patricia Pérez Goldberg
Ricardo C. Pérez Manrique

Primary Documents

Mina Cuero. Judgment. September 7, 2022.pdf
English
Download View
Mina Cuero. Sentencia de 7 de septiembre de 2022.pdf
Spanish
Download View

Supporting files

Mina Cuero. Judgment. September 7, 2022.docx393.79 kB

Mina Cuero. Sentencia de 7 de septiembre de 2022.docx346.27 kB

No References

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

IACourt Documents4
- Order of the President IACHR1
- Hearing1
- IACourt judgment1
- Order of the IACourt1
No Label1
- Case1
Mecanismo1
- Mechanism1
País1
- Country1
Signatories7
- Judge and/or Commissioners7
Signatory Separate Vote3
- Judge and/or Commissioners3
Separate Votes3
- Separate vote3

Create Reference

Select relationship type

Relacionado a
CorteIDH
CIDH
Votos separados
Paises
Jueces intervinientes
País
Multi Select
Mecanismo
Firmantes
Sexo
Tipo
Firmante Voto separado
Estado
Descriptores
Geolocalización de los hechos del caso
Medidas de Protección

Search Tips

Notifications

You're all caught up

New activity will show up here.