34 of the Judicial District of Puno: (a) on the first three dates, he requested copies of reports issued by the prosecutors who intervened in the inspection that took place on August 5, 1999, at the Yanamayo Maximum Security Prison in Puno; (b) on the fourth date, he asked that the head of the Peripheral Central Archive of the Public Prosecution Service of Puno be requested to forward certified copies of the reports issued by the prosecutors who intervened in the inspection that took place in that prison on August 5, 1999. On November 16 153 and 27, 154 2012, and January 25, 2013, 155 the senior prosecutor of the Board of Prosecutors of Puno sent the following replies, respectively: (a) he asked the prosecutor to indicate the number of the report he was requesting, the prosecutors who had signed it, and their current location, and advised that he had requested the Deconcentrated Archive and the Prosecution Units of the Public Prosecution Service of the Judicial District of Puno to forward the information requested, “if it was available in their offices”; (b) he advised that, with the entry into force of the new Code of Criminal Procedure in October 2009, all the documentation prepared before that date had been sent to the Peripheral Central Archive of the Public Prosecution Service of Puno, and not to the Board of Senior Prosecutors of the Judicial District of Puno, and (c) he indicated that the said documentation had not been located and only one document had been found relating to the inspection of August 5, 1999, entitled “Record of Inspection,” which he forwarded. There is no record that any further measures were taken in this regard. 93. On April 27, 2012, the prosecutor asked: (a) the Peruvian Ombudsman for certified copies of the annexes and/or documents in his archives related to the events described in the Report on the Yanamayo Prison of August 25, 1999, 156 and (b) the Director of the National Penitentiary Institute, for information on the inspection that took place on August 5, 1999, in the Yanamayo Maximum Security Prison in Puno, as well as for information on the criminal record and the prisons where Gladys Espinoza and the four women who were with her during this inspection could be found. 157 In reply, on May 11, 2012, the Ombudsman advised that the supervisory visit to the Yanamayo Prison had been made by the Peruvian Ombudsman at the time and other officials, and therefore no record had been made and no documentation had been received. 158 Meanwhile, on May 21 159 and 24, 160 2012, the National Penitentiary Institute advised the prosecutor that it did not have the information requested, because it had only been responsible for the Yanamayo Prison since 2005 and the National Police was in charge of all the documentation prior to that date. It also forwarded the criminal record of the five women. 150 Cf. Note No. 08-2012-3FPS-MP-FN of the Third Supra-provincial Criminal Prosecution Unit to the Board of Prosecutors of Puno of May 7, 2012 (evidence file, folio 8177). 151 Cf. Note No. 08-2012-3FPS-MP-FN of the Third Supra-provincial Criminal Prosecution Unit to the Board of Prosecutors of Puno of October 18, 2012 (evidence file, folio 8616). 152 Cf. Note No. 08-2012-3FPS-MP-FN of the Third Supra-provincial Criminal Prosecution Unit to the Board of Prosecutors of Puno of December 26, 2013 (evidence file, folio 8809). 153 Note No. 10643-2012-MP-PJFS-DJ-Puno of the Board of Prosecutors of Puno to the Third Supra-provincial Criminal Prosecutor, of November 16, 2012 (evidence file, folios 8689 and 8690). 154 Cf. Note No. 11122-2012-MP-PFSP-DJ-Puno of the Board of Prosecutors of Puno to the Third Supra-provincial Criminal Prosecutor, of November 27, 2012 (evidence file, folios 8773 to 8778). 155 Cf. Note No. 184-293-MP-PJFS-DJ-Puno of the Board of Prosecutors of Puno to the Third Supra-provincial Criminal Prosecutor, of January 25, 2013 (evidence file, folios 8880 to 8885). 156 Cf. Note No. 08-2012-3FPS-MP-FN of the Third Supra-provincial Criminal Prosecution Unit to the Ombudsman of April 27, 2012 (evidence file, folio 8088). 157 Cf. Note No. 08-2012-3FPS-MP-FN of the Third Supra-provincial Criminal Prosecution Unit to the National Penitentiary Institute of April 27, 2012 (evidence file, folios 8090 and 8091). 158 Cf. Note No. 0137-2012-DP/ADHPD-PAPP of the Ombudsman to the Third Supra-provincial Criminal Prosecutor of May 11, 2012 (evidence file, folio 8142). 159 Cf. Note No. 379-2012-INPE/24.07 of the National Penitentiary Institute to the Third Supra-provincial Criminal Prosecutor of May 21, 2012 (evidence file, folio 8144). 160 Cf. Note No. 05692-2012-INPE/13-AJ of the National Penitentiary Institute to the Third Supra-provincial Criminal Prosecutor of May 24, 2012 (evidence file, folios 8154 to 8171).