107 well as the services provided by the Public Health Insurance Scheme (SIS), the Court finds it necessary to clarify that any measures of reparation that the Court may establish are based directly on the harm caused by the human rights violations declared in this case. 314. Consequently, the Court establishes that the State must provide, free of charge and immediately through its specialized health care institutions, in an adequate, comprehensive and effective manner, the medical, psychological or psychiatric treatment required by Gladys Carol Espinoza Gonzáles, following her informed consent and if she so wishes, including the provision of medicines, also free of charge. The State must also ensure that the professionals who are assigned assess the victim’s psychological and physical conditions adequately and have sufficient training and experience to treat both her physical health problems and the psychological traumas resulting from the cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment, and the torture she has suffered, which included rape and other forms of sexual violence (supra paras. 185, 187, 196, 208 and 214). To this end, and since Gladys Espinoza is currently incarcerated, these professionals must have access to the place where she is confined, and her transfer, as necessary, to health care institutions must be ensured. Subsequently, the treatments must be provided, insofar as possible, in the health care centers nearest to her place of residence 486 in Peru for as long as necessary. This means that Gladys Espinoza must receive a differentiated treatment in relation to the process and the procedures that have to be complied with in order to be treated in the public hospitals. 487 315. Furthermore, the State must provide, free of charge and immediately, through its specialized health care institutions, in an adequate, comprehensive and effective manner, the psychological or psychiatric treatment required by Manuel Espinoza Gonzáles, following his informed consent and if he so wishes, including the provision of medicines, also free of charge. In addition, the treatments must be provided, insofar as possible, in the health care centers nearest to his place of residence in Peru for as long as necessary. This means that Mr. Espinoza Gonzáles must receive a differentiated treatment in relation to the process and the procedures that have to be complied with in order to be treated in the public hospitals. 316. In addition, when providing psychological or psychiatric treatment to Gladys Espinoza and Manuel Espinoza, it will be necessary to consider the particular circumstances and needs of each victim, in order to provide collective, family or individual treatment, as agreed with each of them and following an individual evaluation. 488 The victims who request this measure of reparation, or their legal representatives, have six month as of notification of this Judgment to advise the State of their intention of receiving psychological or psychiatric treatment and, in the case of Gladys Espinoza, medical treatment also. 489 C.2. Satisfaction C.2.1. Publication of the Judgment 317. The representatives asked the Court to “order the State to publish, within six months, at least the sections on the context and the proven facts, as well as the operative paragraphs of the Judgment in the Official Gazette and in a national newspaper. This publication should also 486 Cf. Case of Cantoral Benavides v. Peru. Reparations and costs. Judgment of December 3, 2001. Series C No. 88, para. 51, and Case of the Human Rights Defender et al. v. Guatemala, supra, para. 258. 487 Cf. Case of Heliodoro Portugal v. Panama. Monitoring compliance with judgment. Order of the Inter-American Court of May 28, 2010, considerandum 28, and Case of Osorio Rivera and family members v. Peru, supra, para. 256. 488 Cf. Case of 19 Tradesmen v. Colombia. Merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of July 5, 2004. Series C No. 109, para. 278, and Case of Osorio Rivera and family members v. Peru, supra, para. 256. 489 Cf. Case of Fernández Ortega et al. v. Mexico, supra, para. 252, and Case of Osorio Rivera and family members v. Peru, supra, para. 256.