112 Espinoza Gonzáles; and (b) US$5,000.00 (five thousand United States dollars) for the nonpecuniary damage suffered by Manuel Espinoza Gonzáles. It also decides to order the State to pay compensation of US$40,000.00 (forty thousand United States dollars) for the non-pecuniary damage suffered by Teodora Gonzáles de Espinoza; this amount to be delivered to her heirs pursuant to paragraph 344 of this Judgment. E) Costs and expenses 335. The representatives asked that, for the Asociación Pro Derechos Humanos (APRODEH), the Court establish, in equity, an amount for the expenses incurred during the domestic and the international proceedings and, for the expenses arising from attending the public hearing of the case in Costa Rica, they requested payment of US$3,156.00. They clarified that, since APRODEH is “a non-profit organization, it has not charged the family any type of honoraria.” In the case of the Center for Justice and International Law (CEJIL), they indicated that it had incorporated the litigation of the case in the international proceedings as of November 19, 2008. For the concept of expenses, which include travel, hotels, communication expenses, photocopies, stationery, and mailings, time dedicated to legal matters relating to this specific case and researching, collecting and presenting evidence, including conducting interviews and preparing briefs, they asked the Court to establish, in equity, the sum of US$6,030.20. They also requested the reimbursement of US$6,293.00 for travel by two persons from Washington, D.C., to Peru, and travel by two persons from Washington, D.C., to Costa Rica to attend the public hearing in this case. 495 They asked that the said amounts be reimbursed directly by the State to the representatives. Lastly, they asked that a sum be set aside for future expenses related to the proceeding of monitoring compliance with the judgment. The Commission did not comment in this regard. 336. The State argued that, although the Center for Justice and International Law (CEJIL) had incorporated the litigation of the case as of November 19, 2008, it had included expenses dated January 18, March 27, April 22 and 26, and September 18 and 19, 2008; in other words, prior to the date on which it had incorporated the international proceedings. 496 Consequently, those expenses were unrelated to the case. It also asserted that some of the vouchers attached by CEJIL were not related to the litigation of the case, especially if it was considered that CEJIL personnel travelled to Peru for several cases and not only for this one. It also observed that the said organization had also carried out various training, academic and research activities. Accordingly, the State listed the expenses that it contested, which were not related to this case. Lastly, the State argued that several vouchers provided by the representatives had smudges, stains, amendments, erasures, and signs of having been corrected, which did not allow the expenses incurred by CEJIL to be assessed or authenticated satisfactorily. 497 495 In this amount they included: airfares, land transportation, accommodation, communications, photocopies, stationery and mailings, honoraria required for the treatment of Lily Cuba by a psychologist owing to the aftereffects of her participation in the public hearing. 496 The following vouchers are related to expenditure prior to the date on which CEJIL incorporated the international proceedings: expense voucher in favor of Michael Camilieri dated April 22, 2008, for US$500.00; per diem receipt signed by Michael Camilieri dated April 22, 2008, for US$350.00; American Express voucher in the name of Viviana Krsticevic for accommodation at the Hotel Nuevo Mundo, Lima, dated April 26, 2008, for US$848.85; expense voucher in favor of Francisco Quintana, dated September 18, 2008, for US$1,950.00; per diem receipt signed by Francisco Quintana, dated September 19, 2008, for US$450.00 and US$1,500.00; expense voucher in favor of Alejandra Vicente, dated September 18, 2008, for US$450.00, and per diem receipt signed by Alejandra Vicente, dated September 19, 2008, for US$450.00. 497 The State objected specifically to the following vouchers: expense voucher in favor of Viviana Krsticevic, dated May 5, 2009, for US$300.00; expense voucher in favor of Ariela Peralta, dated June 23, 2009, for US$400.00; voucher in favor of Alejandra Vicente for expenses from September 20 to 26, 2009, for US$450.00; voucher in favor of Francisco Quintana for expenses from September 20 to October 2, 2009, for US$425.00; voucher in favor of Alejandra Vicente for expenses from April 11 to 16, 2010, and voucher in favor of Francisco Quintana for expenses on November 23 and 24, 2010, for US$220.00.