14 State and considered that the monument should be erected at “Plaza de las Armas”. This request is being considered by the Municipality of Asunción. 43. That the representatives expressed during the hearing that, up to date, the State has not erected any monument and “pressured by the hearing convened, the conversations began". In that respect, they indicated that the victims accept the proposal to erect the monument at the Plaza de Armas. 44. That the Commission expressed, during the hearing, that it is important to come to an agreement”. However, the Commission noted that, given that it is not problematic reparation, the State should undertake to comply with it "as soon as possible". 45. That the Court recalls that the Judgment stipulated the term of one year, as of notice thereof, for the execution of this measure of reparation. After more than three years, there is no evidence that appropriate and sufficient measures have been adopted to erect the monument, which must include the names of the victims and refer to the context of the forced disappearances that occurred during “Operation Condor”. Even though the Court values the will expressed by the State regarding this aspect, as to its commitment to define the physical place, in agreement with the victims, and to erect the monument by June 2010, it is vital for the State to make progress to comply with this measure of reparation and to adopt all the measures and actions necessary to fulfill it, given the real symbolic value of the measure as a guarantee of non-repetition of such serious facts in the future. Therefore, the Court shall continue monitoring compliance with this measure, and to that end, the State shall inform on the progress and the results obtained in relation to this measure. * * * Human rights training programs 46. That as to the State’s obligation to implement permanent programs of human rights training in the Paraguayan police forces, at all levels (operative paragraph eleven of the Judgment), the State communicated that it had implemented human rights training programs at all levels, inasmuch as it had introduced courses addressed to officers, noncommissioned officers and deputy superintendents. The State furnished the respective syllabus of each course to support the information. Likewise, Paraguay informed that the Ministry of Interior and the National Police entered into a Cooperation Agreement with the International Committee of the Red Cross, whose general purpose is to: “Update, develop and promote the inclusion of the international norms of Human Rights and the Humanitarian Principles in the practical activities of the National Police”. As a result of said Agreement, two courses were organized that were called "Formation of Human Rights Instructor" and "III Formation on Human Rights International Norms and Humanitarian Principles Applied to the Police Role" and according to what the State informed, it was set up the "Office of Permanent Human Rights Training and Humanitarian Principles Applied to the Police Role”. In light of the fact that the State acknowledged that the content of the Judgment has not been included in the previously mentioned programs, according to the terms of paragraph 178 of the Judgment, it mentioned that “in the next days, it shall enter into an Agreement