17 the balance in the fiscal year 2010. In addition, since the State fell into arrears, the State must refer to the allocations made to cover the respective accrued interest. * * * Payment of costs and expenses 58. That as to the State’s obligation to pay for costs and expenses (operative paragraph fifteen of the Judgment), the State furnished information proving the effective payment of such item to the requesting organization. 59. That the representatives confirmed the information furnished by the State. 60. That the Court positively values what the State and the representatives informed, as to that the former has made the corresponding payment for costs and expenses in favor of the representatives of the victims and next-of-kin. As a consequence, the State has fully complied with this obligation. * * * 61. That, upon monitoring compliance with the aspects pending compliance in this case, the Court values the advantage of the hearing held to that end, which is evidenced by the good will and cooperation shown by the parties, who have agreed on the fact that some aspects of said Judgment have not been complied with . Specially, the Tribunal values that the State and the representatives have undertaken to hold a meeting as soon as possible, as well as that the State has forwarded a timetable of compliance with the aspects pending full compliance, circumstances that prove the purpose and common commitment to seek full observance of such aspects. Therefore: The Inter-American Court of Human Rights, by virtue of its authority to monitor compliance with its own decisions, pursuant to Articles 62(3), 67 and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, and Articles 25(1) and 25(2) of its Statute and 15(1), 30(2) and 63 of its Rules of Procedure, Declares: 1. That in accordance with Considering clauses 37, 49 and 60 of this Order, the State has complied with the obligation to: a) Publish, once, within six months, in the official gazette and in another newspaper with widespread national circulation, parts of the Judgment (operative paragraph eight and paragraph 175 of the Judgment);